this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
260 points (97.4% liked)

interestingasfuck

1226 readers
235 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I adored that film, although it could have been better with less Maturin.

[–] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

although it could have been better with a less two-dimensional Maturin.

FTFY

You must admit that in the books Maturin is the most compelling and well-explored personality, and the character POB most closely identifies with (finding based solely on personal assumption, mea culpa).

I would assert that the film, as good as it is, reinforces my thesis that the golden age of sail is the least adaptable to film of any literary genre. The movie is to the books as a description of the Grand Canyon is to the actual experience.

Also they are “studding sails” and referred to colloquially as “stun’sl’s” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studding_sail

So there.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Another great one is "Waterloo." Back in the day, the Soviets trained thousands of Red Army troops in Napoleonic cavalry tactics. They wanted to compete with Hollywood when they made 'War And Peace.' Those same troops helped Hollywood make Waterloo, which has a very accurate reenactment of the battle.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

I'll agree regarding movie Maturin. Though it makes sense for him to be a sleeper character for the first book.

If I recall correctly, we didn't even get

massive spoiler for the book seriesany insights into Maturin's life as an international secret agent, or the conflict he feels that his best friend is constantly being redirected to do unwitting awesome spy work, but has no idea how important it is.