this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
636 points (99.2% liked)

196

16719 readers
2361 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Atlusb@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but only because of the gorilla. No other significant difference in policy.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Which policy though?

He did support invading Iraq, he certainly would have invaded Afghanistan. He would have been coup'd by his own party if he actually threatened the fossil fuel industry.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

Gorilla policy

[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“no other significant policy” ≈ would do all the same things, except Gorilla.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

shhh, be quieter when you talk to the gorilla. they're sensitive creatures

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago

Gore supported the first war in Iraq, and bombing Yugoslavia. Why do you think he would have been any different RE gorillas or imperialism?