this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
973 points (97.4% liked)

196

16749 readers
1984 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 265 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Sometimes, the best thing they can do is to not say anything. Walz could have said nothing, and pretty well nobody would have been upset about it.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 136 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Politicians have to say a lot of things whether they mean them or not.

I like ex-New York Mayor Ed Koch's take on voting. "If you agree with me 51% of the time, vote for me. If you agree with me 100% of the time, see a psychiatrist."

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Politicians do NOT have to run a dishonest campaign. They just can't help themselves. Inb4 the obligatory BoTh SiDeS comment.

[–] Glemek@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We do really seem to be selecting for it based on who wins tho

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

The winner always lies to get in. The fucked up thing is that the loser does too

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

no campaigning or politicking here, just pure statesman. his words are absolutely appropriate and expected from a government leader.

[–] Signtist@lemm.ee 83 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which is part of the problem. This whole expectation that our leaders should hide their true feelings and motivations behind a veil of niceties only serves their goals of hiding such things from the people trying to figure out who to vote for. We should know who our politicians are as actual people, since it's the person they are in private that will motivate their actions within the government, not the nice face they put on for the public.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

As I understand it, that is a large part of Trump's success with certain groups.

Admittedly, that turns off people who don't agree with what you're saying...

[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Does he comment on every death? If not, then he shouldn't say anything here either.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

United "Healthcare" is headquartered in Minnesota, and for high profile deaths relevant to the state, yeah he kinda does.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago

Wait until he hears about all the people who have died after getting denied by them.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In that case, I wonder just how much "United" "Healthcare" has put in his coffers.

I'm almost certain it's not zero, I think I saw an article about that a few years ago. UHC, like a lot of companies, throws some money at every viable major politician in the state. That's where we're at with how fucked up US politics is.

[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently they knew eachother personally...

In response to the killing, public officials including Minnesota governor and former Democratic vice president nominee Tim Walz and Senator Amy Klobuchar, expressed dismay and offered condolences to the family. Walz said that he knew Thompson.[26]

It says on the wikipedia page.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago

Ah yes, the actual original meaning of politically correct.

His words were awful and defending a mass murderer that has killed at least tens of thousands of Americans just during his tenure because their boss decided to cheap out is beyond disgusting for a political candidate, much less someone in office that wants to remain in office with all their body parts still attached.

[–] EvilZ@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed, I think that he should have said nothing or perhaps bring out the point that beyond how people may or may not feel we should not aim to live In a society that privilege vigilante that take justice in there hand as it can quickly slip into a very bad place.... I see people suggesting a purge.... I would recommend those people go out and meet some of the victims of the Rwandan genocide and see how they feel with there so called brave words...

It's easy to spout such things using social media because we are anonymous but we do not want such violence to reproduce itself... This is how collateral damage happens. In Montreal an 11 year old child died because of a car bomb that was set by the Rock Machines as retaliation against the Hells Angel's.... No one won that day, we only lost a fraction of our soul as a society when we had to bury a child.

This is the problem, this time someone did a clean shot, what if the killer choses bombs and causes collateral damage. Will any of you sacrifice your children for this so called justice?