this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
739 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3940 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is a cult forming around the denial of the reality around Biden as candidate. The current working term is Blue Maga. Lemmt seems to be a kind of epic enter but it's the exact kind of thing that when Russian propagandists found it, they were able to create The Donald.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also note how the vote totals work. Someone makes a "don't vote for Biden, trust me I'm totally a progressive" post and it immediately gets a ton of upvotes. Someone makes a "hey this whole 'don't vote' thing is kind of stupid" post and it immediately gets a ton of downvotes. But if the post gets big enough, real people balance the vote totals out. The initial votes were just bots/trolls trying to influence the tone of the discussion.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I dont think they are bots. Unless you have direct evidence of that, you shouldn't believe it. I think they are misguided individuals in deep denial of the reality they are in. I mean one of the biggest members of Blue Maga is the head of this sub. And its IDENTICAL to what/ how r/TheDonald formed, its just that a nation state actor hasn't swooped in to take advantage of the latent properties that would lead to the formation of a cult.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unless you have direct evidence of that, you shouldn’t believe it.

That's a dangerous tack to take.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Such is the consequence of living in a fact based reality as opposed to ones own delusions.

You get to believe a whole lot less because there is actually very little we have evidence for.

BUT!

If we have evidence for it, we should believe it.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Direct evidence is a much higher bar than indirect evidence. There's a profusion of indirect evidence. Few of us have the capabilities to potentially find direct evidence. And even if we could, we would be expending far more effort researching than they would making new alt accounts.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There’s a profusion of indirect evidence.

No there isnt.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There absolutely is. In fact, I just explained it.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, you didn't.

You just leaned into your own, lack-of-evidence-based, conclusion that you had made previously.

That's not what it takes to live in a fact based reality.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

It's an absolute necessity to do that to live in a fact based reality. People do not have the TIME to exhaustively research every single thing down to base facts. Not to mention the access, ability, finances, etc. Sometimes, hell most of the time, you have to synthesize information and make a judgement call.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Votes are public, you can see them if you go through a Kbin instance. You could sleuth this out yourself.

But personally, I'm a real person and I downvote you all the time because I think your takes are exactly the Blue MAGA style delusion this person is talking about. So you know where at least one of them is coming from.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Blue MAGA

It's so easy to spot you guys out because you're too stupid to make your own arguments so you have to use talking points given to you by your masters. And this one is a good one, to be fair. But you inevitably over-use the terms / talking points so you become super obvious.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I found the term embarrassing right up until people here started talking about how the polls were fake, the media were the enemy, and everyone arguing against them were Russian trolls or secret MAGA.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Like most right wing talking points, we (liberals) came up with it, in this case to mock tankies who were doing their best to help Trump get elected. And then the right wing propaganda machine stole it and twisted it, like "witch hunt" or "do your own research".