this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
739 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] juergen@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It may also be a little late to introduce a new candidate, unless they have great name recognition. Betcha Bernie 2.0 would mobilize a goodly number of people, while centrists would hold their noses, and just vote for Not Trump.

Bernie isn't running, and Biden isn't quitting, so we take what we can get. At this point, I would literally vote for a loofah if it ran against Trump.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Someone on lemmy said this Sunday that France leftist successfully formed a global left party in 4 weeks, surely Democrats could find a candidate in 4 months.

I want to see AOC as your president.

[–] juergen@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago

Turns out she will actually be old enough to become president even before election day. And she certainly has the name recognition. Again, Biden is not likely to step down - and at this point, I would vote for an empty tube of toothpaste over Trump.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The French situation is very different and the election was a little more complicated than that. They (left and center parties)didn't form a global left party, but only allegedly collaborated on not running against each other in some areas.

This is not an option in the USA presidential election where there only are two candidates to begin with. Introducing a third candidate would only split the votes.

It would be nice to see AOC run eventually, but it wouldn't be a good idea right now. Hopefully both Trump and Biden will be to old next time, so both parties need to find younger candidates.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh I was not talking about left + Macron center (ensemble) but only the left.

The left parties did form a global one, le Nouveau Front Populaire, and I was just referring to that. The left was in shambles between LFI, PS, Les verts etc, a bit of all for themselves. LFI taking the most seats from what was historically le PS (former president Hollande party).

But after announcing the dissolution they managed to be friends again in a very short time. That what was said by that lemmy user.

Macron center was not included and will not be. Stepping down when 3rd to avoid that or that party is nothing new for us, more like a "gentleman agreement" except that this time it was more important than last times.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it was a great idea to force a stale despite the forthcoming troubles of setting a government. In some ways it is similar to the American election by turning it into a vote for or against right wing extremism regardless of who is representing the left side, but I can't see the American democrats having any similar options available.

On the other hand it's kind of sad having to force an election to be limited to a two choice vote. Block politics or single issue politics are usually not good for democracy. Unfortunately it's happening everywhere. People are turning more extreme in both directions based on their Facebook feed..

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ah the facebook feeds… I am considering using the fediverse left beard Linux dudes to make an army of leftist devs/sys admins etc.

Use the same tools as the extreme right (like boting) to flood Facebook, Twitter etc with leftist views and positives stories.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At this point, I would literally vote for a loofah if it ran against Trump.

Then we don't need name recognition. Any middle of the road Democrat will do.

[–] juergen@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

The name recognition is just in case other voters are pickier / more discerning. If it's someone super cool, they may even pull in people who were not going to vote. Yes, I would literally vote for a rusty bottle cap over Trump, but others may have different requirements.