Greentext

4483 readers

1183 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

1213

Anon is a nostalgic gamer (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

186 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

There are some. For example extraction shooters kinda lose a core aspect of its genre because the player interactions are built on the idea that you don't know who the other groups in the server are. Are they hostile? Are they friendly? Will they stab me in the back or help me out? How many are in a group? Technically it would be possible to set up community servers (if you had access to the server software) but if your community plays on the same server you kinda lose that uncertainty of who you're going to meet, because you know the people you're playing with.

Another one IMO that benefit from matchmaking are 1v1 games. Chess or fighting games or anything of the sorts. Community servers would be moot because you can only have 2 people in a match. You could probably build a tournament style community server but it wouldn't add much value. I think matchmaking makes much more sense there.

There might be more but I think that list will be relatively short and in general most games would probably benefit more from having community servers.