this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
433 points (96.6% liked)

Games

32711 readers
1409 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The request includes a term to shutdown Palworld IIRC

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was a request to halt sales until the specific mechanics were removed, with the mechanics being throwing pokeball like items and riding monsters.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trying do ban riding fictional animals is a tall order

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ackshually 🤓

One of the patents was for seamlessly transitioning from one type of ride to another, as it happens in Legends Arceus, ie: jumping into the water while riding the stag will automatically change to the giant piranha. The irony here is that palworld lacks anything like that, you never transition between 2 different mounts without player input. The closest to that is using some pals as gliders, but you'll just get back on your feet once you touch the ground or water.

Another patent was for throwing stuff at enemies in order to begin combat. They're all hard reads, mostly because they read like they're describing how Legends Arceus works in minute detail.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

Another patent was for throwing stuff at enemies in order to begin combat.

Are Nintendo suing reality now? I must admit, it would be very on brand for them.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck it, have Nintendo sue blizzard whole they're at it. I want to see a nerd bloodbath.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 16 hours ago

Blizzard of course can't sue anyone because that would require an original idea to copyright.

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I looked through a few articles but couldn't find anything about a term that would shutdown Palworld just because Nintendo won the lawsuit.

The worst case scenario would be something like Palworld having to change their "Pal Spheres" into "Pal Cubes" or prisms, or something similar.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The Palnoctahedron. "It's a totally different shape and it's just the fact that it's very small, and we enabled smooth shading, that makes it look like we haven't done anything to it."

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In Japan.

With the money they've made already, they could move the team to US, where none of this would fly.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 15 hours ago

They would still have to face the courts in Japan if they want to sell in Japan.

Your line of thinking is the same thing that X fell for with Brazil. Just because you don't have your HQ in a particular country doesn't mean the legal system can be ignored. Otherwise the EU wouldn't be gifting fines to Google and Apple every 15 minutes.