this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
632 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3324 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Breaking the rules isn't fascism though. Fascism is fascism.

What do you think is a more ethical choice:

a) uphold the law, knowing it will let fascist come to power and kill thousands

a) break the law and stop him

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Breaking the rules isn’t fascism though. Fascism is fascism.

It is precisely fascism. It's ignoring the rule of law to achieve authoritarian aims. Why is it ok when you agree with the outcome and not ok when you don't? But way more importantly, once you do it you cannot go back. If Biden did this and Trump ended up winning - make no mistake Biden has no authority to remove candidates from ballots - then Trump would feel completely justified in jailing his opponents.

What do you think is a more ethical choice

A. Because the premise of your choice is flawed. You do not know that breaking the law would stop him. You do not know -with certainty- that not breaking the law would result in that outcome. But we do know that being authoritarian to achieve aims we believe in is no better than people we disagree with doing the exact same. What would happen if Biden was successful in stopping Trump but then, because we wouldn't ever keep unfettered presidential power... right? RIGHT? We're the "good" guys... what would happen if MAGA Republicans won in 2028? I doubt we'd ever have another election again.

[–] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Uh, Trump feels completely justified in jailing his enemies already. Will it happen? I'm not excited to wait and find out.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

True. But the one thing we've got going for us is that it is demonstrably wrong and we didn't fall into the trap of proving it was justified.

Edit: well at least two people think it's ok to use authoritarian political power to counter authoritarian political power. Do you really think that ever works out? Note that this is very distinct from something like civil war or overthrowing the government. It's doing the exact thing you don't want your opponent to do.

[–] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Tis a risky game, doing what's right.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"what’s right" is, sadly not an agreed-upon concept.

[–] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

That may be true, but I happen to believe that truth does exist. All we can do is hold on to it.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Are you really achieving authoritarian aims if the end goal is not authoritarian?

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

Ah, the benevolent dictator fallacy. Because no person or party would ever abuse power or fail to give it up once the "aim" is achieved. There certainly would be no expansion in what the "aim" is. And definitely the people we agree with are always good.

[–] putainsdetoiles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt we’d ever have another election again.

With Trump in office, and Project 2025 in the pipeline, I doubt we're ever going to have another election anyway.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

I doubt we’re ever going to have another election anyway.

I sometimes feel that way. But I still have some faith in people, particularly Gen Z. I believe after the shit hits the fan and keeps hitting it for 4 years, that we'll turn this around. And because we didn't agree to make presidents kings we can actually do that.