this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
582 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59361 readers
3684 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Well, there goes the Fediverse.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Considering the fediverse microblogging scene includes Threads, which claims to have hundreds of millions of active users, I'd say its death is greatly exaggerated.

Yes, I know a lot of Mastodon servers refuse to federate with Threads, and yes I know their active user figures are likely very different from what they claim. But at the end of the day, it's an ActivityPub microblogging platform with a considerable userbase and a very rich corporate backer.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Isn't it disabled by default?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 102 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hardly. The Fediverse spans multiple apps and services, and it existed before Elon bought Twitter and it will continue existing regardless of what the billionaires do, because it's not run by just one person.

The whole point is decentralization, not growth, so unless the billionaires can take out every server hosting an instance, the Fediverse isn't going anywhere.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This.

Back in the day this is how the internet worked. Every forum host was just some guy or girl hosting a platform so they coukd build a community with the people and hobbies they love.

We need to go back closer to that world. The fediverse bridges the gap between the centralized experience, and decentralized management.

Optimistically, it's the best of both worlds.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I was gonna say. It's this exactly. Plus a nice feature of Fediverse stuff is that it can scale down to hobby levels if needed. Venture funded commercial services abhor this and will compromise all kinds of things (e.g. morals, ethics) to keep going at whatever scale they're at.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 10 points 1 day ago

I know I can't ever go back. I donate to my instance, and I actually feel good about it, because I know it's not going into the pocket of some faceless corporation who's beholden to its shareholders instead of its customers.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think it's the worst outcome or the Fediverse needing to be written off because of this. At least for now BridgyFed is a thing, and it's not like we have to capture every refugee, Mastodon has thriving and tight-knit communities.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago

Most Mastodon groups are about Mastodon, Fediverse and the drama accompanying both.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 day ago

The fediverse is considered 'over' when parasitic leeches like Musk and Spez come knocking on Lemmy's and BlueSky's doors like "we want growth...please sell to us".