Yes, but Coffee Stain is Swedish, and they're the publisher. Maybe they can get a sign that's half the dimensions of the others...?
Telorand
Maybe? It depends what Timeshift was monitoring/backing up. In any case, the tool you used to generate the keys I believe has the ability to delete the keys (they're just files on your system). Look up the documentation to be sure. It's been a hot minute since I mucked around with Secure Boot, and it's not strictly required, so I just gave up.
That's about the extent of my secure boot knowledge. I do hope more knowledgeable people have better advice for you!
Yes, but you can really only do that with single characters, since your first example is an ordered group and the second is an unordered set in a capturing group. The equivalency drops off when you include more characters.
Plus, you can do things like [a-zA-Z]
, and you can't do that with the former example.
I would imagine there's a difference in computing overhead, too, but I have no idea which is more performant.
But then you'd match terms like "liNuX" and "UniX," and that's just silly. 😆
I forget what the order of operations is, but you didn't fuck it up. I've deleted the keys and started over before, though I never got secure boot to work for me in the end. Hopefully somebody smarter can provide more insight.
Because there's non-programmers in this community, if you aren't sure what this means but are too afraid to ask, it's a Regular Expression that better represents the terms "Linux" and "Unix."
Though if we're going to be that pedantic, it would be [nN][uiI][xX]$
. That extra pipe wouldn't actually do anything in the last example, because regexp picks one character from the set by default.
And if we want to be really pedantic,
(?!nix)[nN][uI][xX]$
Would be the most accurate.
I would also love that! The truth of this matter would be much preferred over a bunch of cast aspersions.
Probably not. I've used it as well (before I knew about Glim) to preview distros, but I am not using it to do installs, since I can't be certain what's in it.
I have quite literally never seen that. The majority of the time, somebody brings up Ventoy, somebody mentions the opaque blobs or some other legitimate criticism, and a bunch of fanbois pile onto that person for having their own opinions or concerns.
Ventoy works well, but the lack of transparency concerns me and people like me.
I'ma run prime95 for a bit first.
Clickbait title. It's just LLMs doing what they're designed to do. Since they're basically complex iterative algorithms, the person in question did a thing using a tool they didn't fully understand, and that had consequences.
People should be looking at LLMs like Monkey Paws instead of "assistants."