this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
506 points (73.9% liked)
People Twitter
4931 readers
1616 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying.
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They voted for "anyone else" and that matters.
There isn't a challenger because the Party doesn't want there to be one. There's no alternative being offered, that can be changed.
I'm going to keep posting this because it's so interesting, I heard an interesting idea on DemocracyNow
We could find out who the challenger would be by having a democratic and involved party, instead of just waiting for a top-down demand to vote for Harris or whatever.
Yes it matters, as a protest about Israel-Palestine, which I explicitly addressed. Surely you can understand that that is not the same as voting for another candidate? It’s a protest vote, not a vote for or against a candidate. They used the primary as a way to signal their feelings on an issue.
Beyond that: Saying “I just want someone else” is meaningless. Everybody says that across both parties year after year. The moment you put a name forward, then the responses actually matter.
Biden is the most Zionist Democrat in the field. Voting another candidate, inherently, means voting for someone less supportive of Israel
And it doesn't fucking matter what name I put forward, I'm not the one in charge of the party. Names can come forward naturally and democratically as part of a condensed nominating process.
I, personally, think Michelle Obama would do well and could be a good President. I don't like Kamala Harris but she has a lot of advantages and I guess I could vote for her.
But what I want are candidates to present themselves and make their case, not for them to be hand picked. Democracy.
That's not my fucking job.
That's theirs and they should fucking do it.