this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
1239 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck AI

1090 readers
46 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corroded@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The problem isn't the rise of "AI" but more so how we're using it.

If a company wants to create a machine learning model that analyzes metrics on an automated production line and spits out parameters to improve the efficiency of their equipment, that's a great use of the technology. We don't need a LLM to produce a useless summary of what it thinks is a question when all I want is a page of search results.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI is a tool. what matters is what humans do with the tool, not the tool itself

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

“LLMs don’t kill the climate, people do!”

I believe I’ve heard a similar argument before… 🤔

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Guns are made to kill. When someone gets killed by a gun, that's the gun being used for the thing's primary intended purpose. They exist to cause serious harm. Causing damage is their entire reason for existing.

Nobody designed LLMs with the purpose of using up as much power as possible. If you want something like that, look at PoW crypto currencies, which were explicitly designed to be inefficient and wasteful.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ahh, see, but the gun people don't say it's solely to kill. They say it's "a tool". I guess it could be for hunting, or skeet shooting, or target practice. One could argue that they get more out of owning a gun than just killing people.

But the result of gun ownership is also death where it wouldn't have otherwise occurred. Yes, LLMs are a tool, but they also destroy the environment through enormous consumption of energy which is mostly created using non-renewable, polluting sources. Thus, LLM use is killing people, even if that's not the intent.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Difference remains whatever people claim. Guns are weapons made to cause damage first and foremost, and tools second. LLMs are tools first and whatever else second. You can un-dangerousify a tool by using it properly, but you can't do that with a literal weapon. Danger and damage and harm is their entire reason to exist in the first place.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Good point, but I also think that the intent does not necessarily affect the result. BTW I also think guns shouldn't be a thing, unless under very strict circumstances (military, licensed hunters). I also posit that the use of unlicensed LLMs in the general public is proving to be irresponsible. That is to say, a specific and worthy use case should be established and licensed to use these "AI" tools.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The scale of llm use right now coupled with the fossil fuel use is pretty bad yes

[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

One might argue it's killing more people in the past 30 years than all guns have throughout history

[–] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

So than rename this place fuck people...