this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
158 points (91.6% liked)

Chronic Illness

273 readers
61 users here now

A community/support group for chronically ill people. While anyone is welcome, our number one priority is keeping this a safe space for chronically ill people.

This is a support group, not a place for people to spout their opinions on disability.

Rules

  1. Be excellent to each other

  2. Absolutely no ableism. This includes harmful stereotypes: lazy/freeloaders etc

  3. No quackery. Does an up-to date major review in a big journal or a major government guideline come to the conclusion you’re claiming is fact? No? Then don’t claim it’s fact. This applies to potential treatments and disease mechanisms.

  4. No denialism or minimisation This applies challenges faced by chronically ill people.

  5. No psychosomatising psychosomatisation is a tool used by insurance companies and governments to blame physical illnesses on mental problems, and thereby saving money by not paying benefits. There is no concrete proof psychosomatic or functional disease exists with the vast majority of historical diagnoses turning out to be biomedical illnesses medicine has not discovered yet. Psychosomatics is rooted in misogyny, and consisted up until very recently of blaming women’s health complaints on “hysteria”.

Did your post/comment get removed? Before arguing with moderators consider that the goal of this community is to provide a safe space for people suffering from chronic illness. Moderation may be heavy handed at times. If you don’t like that, find or create another community that prioritises something else.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

While “predictive processing” is a valid hypothesis, there’s far too little empirical evidence to even start to accept it as fact.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03891-9

Clark’s book is pop science. Some guys scientific theory presented as if it’s fact.

It’s championed by some schools of philosophers and cognitive scientists (and wholly refuted by others).

[–] Evilschnuff 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I feel like you’re doing Andy Clark a disservice by calling him some guy.