this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
86 points (95.7% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2389 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen suggesting replacing Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) with U.S. exports in a phone conversation with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Nov. 8.

Von der Leyen spoke with Trump three days after his victory in the Nov. 5 presidential election.

Replacing Europe's supplies of Russian LNG was "one of the topics" the two leaders discussed, von der Leyen told reporters in Budapest.

. . .

The European Union imposed its first major restrictions on Russian gas, including LNG, in its 14th sanctions package in June. Russia still remains Europe's second-largest importer of LNG, after the U.S.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

So, Trump just keeps on winning? How about getting rid of the gas dependency altogether? I feel like people are just making one poor choice after the other these days.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's simply a strategic move to cater to Trump's ego.

It's actually genius. Make Trump look good, tie US closer to Europe while unshackling from Russia.

Appealing to Trump's ego is the only way allies will survive. And if Trump ever leaves office, it's still good news if Dems get back in.

The actual logistical process of getting away from LNG is probably more monumental than is feasible in the near-term.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Appealing to Trump's ego is the only way allies will survive.

Very bold of you to assume that the only way "allies will survive" is by the grace of the US. Shit Americans say.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm American, but I try not to say shit like that because it's not true.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That in no way precludes one from being a tanky, but let's explore:

  • As if their defense wasn't heavily reliant upon the US umbrella and budget that dwarfs their capability
  • As if we didn't bail them the fuck out in WWII.
  • As if this very fucking action by the EU isn't proof of that, itself.

God, I can't believe you actually got me defending our own military industrial complex. But hey, I really hope you prove me wrong for their sake.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, the "me big strong American man" response. What else is new...

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Your standpoint is toxic. Doesn't deserve any real consideration.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lmao of course this is all you've got in response. This is why people don't take you seriously.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

Toxic masculinity doesn't deserve a real response. They'll just respond with another caveman answer. Seen it a hundred times before.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

How about getting rid of the gas dependency altogether?

Already in the works, though for the time being (until fusion) Europe will be dependent on imports for energy and chemical feedstock but in the future that's going to be ammonia (aka transportable hydrogen) from e.g. Canada and Namibia, produced by gigantic amounts of new solar and wind installations.

Also even though fusion is slated to finally arrive in the 2030s (Max Planck is now getting into commercialisation so yes it's serious) it's probably going to be a while before it's price-competetive with renewables from places really suited for renewables, especially when we're not talking raw electricity but stuff that can be transported more easily. So those investments abroad won't be instant write-offs.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Because replacing a heating system with a different one is expensive and a lot of pensioniers can't afford this.