this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
539 points (95.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35806 readers
1406 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Economy

This is Trump's economy, you idiots. This is the fallout from his incompetence and malice. But heaven forbid voters understand basic principles which rule their lives.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i think you give too much credit to Trump. the economy has been rigged against the working class for a long time. it's just getting progressively more brutal which makes people feel increasingly insecure.

an insecure working class elects strongmen who promise simple solutions

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The best, simplest summation I've seen. Thank you. I've been searching for something to make sense of it and this is definitely it. Being forced into voting for the "least worst" candidate obscures where that path is headed by either candidate.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

It's the pattern in American politics that has existed since I was born: Republicans fuck the economy, Democrats do their best to fix it, people blame the Democrats for the bad economy and elect Republicans who fuck it up even more.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, sorry, but you don't get to say that four years later.

The economy got trashed in his last year... but remember how the sparse economic relief that were carried through the democratic congress got completely wiped out as soon as Biden took office? When the democrats took away the child tax credit childhood poverty doubled overnight. And you may say the cause of the inflation was Trump's mismanagement (And it wasn't. The supply chain breakdown would have happened no matter who was in office.) what was the democratic response? Fucking Chicago school.

What's happening is the US empire is not so slowly rotting and material conditions are deteriorating. That's independent of what party is in power. But both parties are wedded to capital. And voters are hopping from one foot to the other while standing on that hot skillet trying to find relief. You're not going to find it without overthrowing capitalism. This is the barbarism we were warning you about.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And it wasn’t. The supply chain breakdown would have happened no matter who was in office

if i remember correctly, COVID brought our inflation up to roughly 6%. then the Ukrainian war took it the rest of way where it peaked near 9% (over 10% in my home state)

these things would have happened anyway, although choosing to prolong the Ukrainian war as long as possible most definitely increased inflation. people think we only gave 2 or 3 hundred billion, but realistically the American public has paid more than a trillion in the invisible tax that is inflation. hundreds of thousands of layoffs because of higher interest rates are also connected to this

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's not forget that a large part of the inflation, and especially on food and housing, was driven by pure greed and opportunism from the capitalists that control those basic necessities. And that's something that could have been prevented with tools that capital permitted under Ronald Fucking Reagan.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

it's an eternal battle. every once in a while we pass legislation to try and reign in corporate power. like for example the anti trust act in the early 1900s

the issue is that public attention is temporary. eventually we move on to the next crisis and people forget. grow complacent.

corporate interest, however, is eternal. it's persistent and never gives up. it keeps pushing, infallibly, in order to weaken the structures meant to reign in their power. whether by legislation/policy (AT&T and friends unilaterally killing Net Neutrality some years back, Disney signing into law expansion of copyright, etc) or through more subtle methods (buying politicians and getting people into positions of power that have no intention of enforcing the laws)

this is inevitably what happens with every democracy. eventually the vigilance fails and the structures of power are hijacked by opportunists.

although having said all that, I don't think greed had much to do with the inflation we saw. Sure, some companies took advantage and raised prices more than they needed to just to inflate that extra juicy profit margin.

but realistically we're headed to war and war means massive government spending which means inflation

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're separating government from the capitalists and I don't think that's an accurate way of looking at the world. Capital will eat itself even more voraciously than it does right now without some mediating force on itself. Government isn't a hedge against capitalism that mediates its excesses. It is a PART of capitalism that mediates its excesses. The anti-trust act wasn't for us; it was for them.

But the reality that capitalism is a fundamentally unstable system can't be fixed by blunting it. And as the rate of profit goes down, the very restraints that capital put on itself to ensure its survival must be destroyed in pursuit of that profit.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i think most legislation is explicitly for the capitalist class. that much we probably agree with

but i do think every once in a while, when there is a ton of pressure and the elites are scared, they throw a bone to the working class.

it happened with the antitrust act, it happened with the New Deal, and it happened in the 1960s with the Civil Rights era and the end to Vietnam

yes, capitalism will eat itself. it's what we're essentially seeing right now in slow motion. but there is something there in democracy beyond just capitalism. even if it's buried deep down and impotent

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it happened with the antitrust act, it happened with the New Deal, and it happened in the 1960s with the Civil Rights era and the end to Vietnam

The thing that ties all of these exceptions together is the immediate threat of ideologically organized revolutionary cadres mobilizing the masses into a socialist revolution

[–] kava@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah exactly. when the system is about to blow up, they turn a valve and release a little steam

that's one of two paths we are headed towards today. the pressure is building up. we either need to turn the valve soon OR we're gonna blow up

i have a feeling though we're headed for the explosion route

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yeah exactly. when the system is about to blow up, they turn a valve and release a little steam

Not once it gets to that point. The release valve of elections is a hedge against this kind of thing happening in the first place.

Those movements were resolved by murdering their leaders and imprisoning their organizers for several decades.

I guess it's best to say they do both at the same time

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the advantage of the 2 party system. There is no other way out except revolution. In most European countries there is still an irrational but valid hope for regular reform through regular political means. Those countries are fated to linger on like this a little longer.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How can hope be both irrational and valid?

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

When it's based on emotions or tradition. "We're too big to fail" or "We're the best, so we'll get there". Those are good motivators, but completely unbased

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Worse: Congress purposely intended for the president to not have direct control over the economy.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Right, but the administration's actions typically get attributed to the president, plus the president does have a measure of control through executive orders, or proposals which get carried through the house and Senate. The president will obviously sign any initiative that they themselves proposed.