this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
89 points (94.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

322 readers
2 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah i just wish it showed which mod did what action tho

[–] subignition@fedia.io 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It used to, I believe the option to anonymize the acting moderator was added in at some point

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah its a setting in admin panel. Defaults to anonymouse unfortunatly tho

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They did it that way on purpose hoping more people would use it accidentally rather than it being a desired thing to use.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah i dont like it goes against the open philosophy of lemmy imo

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Same way with private votes, oh and they also want to force servers to manually review all user sign-ups (devs have literally said that to me) even for servers which can handle automatic creation and have spam protection bots in place.

A lot of things they do are surprisingly against the open nature of Lemmy and the fediverse as a whole.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

Votes fundamentally cant be private due to the way Activpub works otherwise anyone with an instance can spoof an arbitrary amount pf votes (u can do this with extra accounts but its a whole proccess).

I think its cos the devs have very strong political opinions and are only now realising they are losing control of the narrative due to said open nature. The open nature of federation (and the free speach it enables) is our best strength that has the capability to reshape the digital narrative towards a free (as in freedom) and inclusive future.

Federarion is everythibg web3.0 promised to be but with blackjack and hookers.

[–] Blaze 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Seems reasonable to avoid mod harassment

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then there needs to be modmail. There had to be a way to reach "a representative"

[–] subignition@fedia.io 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I dunno, I'm from the really old days of forums where you either had an alt account to moderate with, or where the penalties for harassing a mod over a moderation action was a kos

I kinda feel like it should be the norm for it to be public, but there's a line to be drawn somewhere to disallow endless arguments about it

[–] Blaze 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

kos

What's a kos? Kick off server?

[–] subignition@fedia.io 11 points 3 weeks ago

Kill on sight; like an IP ban, but if you made an alt account to get around it, that account would get banned too

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

I've moderated a number of communities on a number of platforms over the years and I've never seen it be a problem. I don't think it's worth losing accountability.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't think that it should list which individual removed the content, but it should at least say if the removal was done by "[instance] admins" or "[comm] mods".