Work Reform

10021 readers

469 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

525

Business execs just said the quiet part out loud on RTO mandates — A quarter admit forcing staff back into the office was meant to make them quit (www.itpro.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Many people are willing to accept lower pay for a remote role, making it a highly effective tool for companies to leverage against workers.

Interesting way to look at things. You could then look at it like this: Allowing people to work from home was essentially a raise. And now they are rescinding it.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, you can frame it however you want, but the reality is that companies are using people’s attachment to WFH as a tool to cut costs and churn out employees more cheaply. By pushing return-to-office mandates, they’re nudging people to leave without having to call it a pay cut or layoff—it’s a workaround that makes it easier for them to replace folks with new hires who’ll take the conditions they’re setting.

Whether you want to call it a "rescinded raise" or not doesn’t change the fact that this tactic is all about control and cutting down labor costs. And unlike an actual rescinded raise, there aren't as many laws and rules about notification, etc. So it's fine to think of it that way as long as you don't convince yourself RTO has the same provisions required of a pay cut, which is why it's being used in the ways I described previously.