this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
-29 points (26.2% liked)

Open Source

31371 readers
61 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] the_strange 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your words, not mine. If they were afraid of malicious code coming from these sources they would've removed them earlier and not only after their legal department recommend these maintainers be removed.

Open source doesn't mean that malicious code isn't impossible though. For a project as large as the Linux kernel it is unlikely, but see the xz-utils incident earlier this year for example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor

[โ€“] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago

Yes I expected that argument. My point was there was no valid reason to remove them. The xz case didn't convince any other projects to get rid of maintainers based on their nationality after all.

It's obviously my own opinion that what Linus did was an nonnegotiable red flag but I'd prefer to stick with it for now. I guess making this discussion political was a pretty harmful decision so I'll remove some of my replies in order to avoid creating more drama.