this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
519 points (92.2% liked)

Trans Memes

1115 readers
66 users here now

A place to post memes relating to the transgender experience.

Rules

  1. Follow lemmy.blahaj.zone community guidelines.
  2. Posts must be trans related.
  3. No bigotry.
  4. Do not post or link to pornography.
  5. If a post is tagged with a specific gender identity, keep the conversation centered on that identity.
  6. Posts that assume the viewer’s gender and/or contain potentially triggering content must be spoilered and tagged at the beginning of the post title. Example content-warning tags that you can copy include the following:
  1. Mods can be arbitrary.

Recommendations

  1. Include other tags in posts for example:
  1. Include image description when possible.
  2. Link to source

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
0x2640@lemmy.blahaj.zone
519
Pretty Easy Choice (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 weeks ago by Soluna@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/17869503

I know I'm going against the grain here, I'm obviously no Harris lover, but also I'd prefer to be allowed to continue existing. If that's controversial in leftist spaces then maybe I don't want to spend any more time in leftist spaces.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KammicRelief@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

I think it's more the third party voters (which effectively are Republican voters, by taking away Dem votes). And abstainers, which, ditto.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

Third party votes and abstainers for the presidency are by no measures 'taking away' votes from anyone.

It only can be that way if there are zero Republican voters voting third party or abstaining for any reason. We know this isn't true. The Democratic Party's express electoral strategy is to appeal to and attract those voters, ostensibly at a greater return rate than voters they turn off or drive to third parties.

It's a risky strategy and it failed once before in 2016.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

this was proven to be a straw man since the report than jill stein siphons away more trump voters than kamala voters.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you explain in detail how my California 3rd party vote will help Trump?

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The Republican strategy is to contest the election in every state, county, and polling place. We need high voter turnout to prevent contested elections all over the country. No matter where people live, even California, our votes matter.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

So you think trump will spend money trying to to flip my district that went 78% for Biden in my state that went 63.5% for Biden so I cannot exercise my constitutionally protected right to do anything but support a corpo prosecutor.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

As someone who supports third party, there was no chance of me voting for Kamala this election so you can stop with the made-up arguments

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 weeks ago

Are you saying that 2/3 of the country vote Republican? In that case, how is it possible for the Democrats to ever win?