this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
948 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“We see it now: The hate has shifted to the trans community,” Walz said. “They see that as an opportunity. If you’re watching any sporting events right now, you see that Donald Trump’s closing arguments are to demonize a group of people for being who they are.”

“We’re out there trying to make the case that access to healthcare, a clean environment, manufacturing jobs, and keeping your local hospital open are what people are really concerned about,” he continued. “They’re running millions of dollars of ads demonizing folks who are just trying to live their lives.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 207 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

I'm honestly heartened to hear Waltz specfically voice support for trans folk. This is opposed to Harris who said she would follow the law in regards to my community, which sounds good but I need everyone to understand that it could be said by a governor in a southern state enforcing anti trans legislation. Waltz actually went the distance to say we should to be legally left alone. There is a stark difference between these two statements, even if I glad to hear both.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 100 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We're just a few weeks away from the election. The candidates have two different but important roles.

  • Presidential candidate: keep the base in line while not alienating swing voters
  • VP candidate: say things that the presidential candidate can't say

As much as you may want Harris to say something like "We will defend the trans community," it's going to alienate swing voters.

It makes no earthly sense the election is this close but it is. Kamala can't afford a misstep but Tim can.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I completely understand that and I do not fault Harris for giving a precise diplomatic answer in the Fox interview on what some voters see as a sensitive issue. Which is difficult for me to even type because the concept of my existence is a "political issue" to some.

However, I do take exception with it being characterized as "Harris announce support for trans community", because that's just not what she said. Which is why I am happy to hear Waltz clarify and go further.

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, I just wanted to tell you something cause it sounds like you might be in a bad place. Even with all of the political finger pointing surrounding your identity, you need to know something very important.

Your life matters. Your experiences matter. Your feelings matter.

You matter.

Ignore all the hatred and all the fear. Ignore the bigotry and close mindedness. Ignore it all and know that there are so many people out there that will love you and support you and accept you.

You are not alone.

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We can't ignore it when they're constantly passing more and more draconian laws that make our lives infinitely harder all across the United States.

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You're correct. But i also said Ignore and not "do nothing". It's possible to ignore the hate while still fighting for your rights.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

I hate to say it but everything is fucking political now. Yes it sucks that it's tied to your identity but identity politics scores super easy points with conservatives because it's so much easier to point out vs the massive wealth disparities between people like Musk and you and me.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you think swing voters might in fact be fucking morons? I'm so tired of the fate the world resting in the hands of low information people who seemingly command the memory and political acumen of the proverbial goldfish.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

No fucking shit they’re morons. But you still need their votes to win. Democracy isn’t rule by the intelligent its rule by the people regardless of their intelligence

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Oh no question. But even moron votes count (at least statistically speaking).

So at this point, I fully expect Harris to run a much tighter ship than she has been and Trump to increase his very violent rhetoric.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

It's insane the amount of trans hate I have been hearing this past month alone (in real life). I have to explain: Sure, they weren't always front and center as today's political issues make them seem but they still existed. Their existence is not a recent development in any way. Tiktok isn't turning your kids into anything.

It's not just people who identify as Republicans or religious people either. I can see why the anti-queer vote is important to both parties; their numbers are staggering.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

He doesn't get nearly as much press as Vance which is sad. He just seems like a nice guy and awesome Dad and for that alone I'd be glad to have him as VP.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Honestly called the gov office right after he got the nomination.

I’m a teacher, I want to still be at least, but they’ve made it dangerous for trans people to exist in Oklahoma. There’s currently a court hold on ANY investigation based on gender identity discrimination in schools.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Harris spoke in support of funding all transgender healthcare as doctors see necessary, including for inmates, years ago and when asked to double down on that stance recently she did so.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Conversion therapy" is definitely not the phrase you were looking for.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah sorry nice catch

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/10/harris-position-on-health-care-for-transgender-prisoners-and-detainees/

The afformentioned ACLU stance survey was in 2019

https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2024/08/Harris-ACLU-Candidate-Questionnaire.pdf

  1. As President will you use your executive authority to ensure that transgender and non- binary people who rely on the state for medical care — including those in prison and immigration detention — will have access to comprehensive treatment associated with gender transition, including all necessary surgical care? If yes, how will you do so?

Yes X No ⬜

Explanation (no more than 500 words): It is important that transgender individuals who rely on the state for care receive the treatment they need, which includes access to treatment associated with gender transition. That’s why, as Attorney General, I pushed the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide gender transition surgery to state inmates. I support policies ensuring that federal prisoners and detainees are able to obtain medically necessary care for gender transition, including surgical care, while incarcerated or detained. Transition treatment is a medical necessity, and I will direct all federal agencies responsible for providing essential medical care to deliver transition treatment.

Despite it being seen as good and decent by us, many people here appear to be completely unaware while for conservatives this has been a huge anti-Harris talking point. Trump even brought it up during the debate.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To clarify my earlier hostility, I think there's been a misunderstanding here. What you just cited is support for the opposite of conversion therapy…

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah sorry poor choice of words on my part. I meant sex change.

[–] JohnnyH842@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey not trying to be an internet jerk, just wanted to point out that his last name is Walz not "Waltz". Hope you have a great day.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh dang, you're totally right! I honestly appreciate ya pointing that out, thank you and have a great day as well! ♥️

[–] tbird83ii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the news can't seem to get it correct, so i get your confusion. They also pronounce it "waltz".

Its really pronounced like "walls".

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I’m glad Harris framed it that way. It’s a position that’s easy to make into a rough sound bite. The goal is always to not make the election about trans people. Politicians harping on trans issues regardless of position do poorly. Call opposition to us a real freak show move and talk about how real Americans want the Midwestern values of all of us just getting along at our manufacturing jobs.