this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
403 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

58635 readers
3562 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 80 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Nothing that cannot be fixed by a Linux install.

[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 21 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

For personal computing, sure. For enterprise environment, eh not really.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The only (larger) enterprises that insist "we depend on Windows" are those with shitty corporate IT :)

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And several governments from various countries and at various levels (municipal, state, federal)

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

there's

  1. US government, with a mandate to use Windows for the same reason that Boeing CEOs of the past decade aren't in jail for hundredfold manslaughter
  2. other governments, where again, "shitty corporate IT" applies, but with s/corporate/administrative

Even worse: governments using Windows are absolutely giving the US services direct access to all their confidential files & communication.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

With the amount of money corporations and governments have spent on Microsoft — the last decade alone — they could have filled the gaps in linux and the annual cost for ITSM would be significantly cheaper. Instead they've spent more and have grown far more dependent on proprietary software, they don't own or control, to manage their core business ops and data; the longer their dependence on SaaS, the more they'll pay.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 26 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, Imagine how good the software would be oif we had all the governments and enterprise paying into open source instead of Microsofts pocket.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

Can you imagine a world where public money was only spent for the public good? What a world!

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

Yes corpo IT doesn't have the skills other than buy the easiest options and raise tickets to vendors.

Those people choose to live the techno-dystopia for the sheer convenience of it.

They will just copy whatever the rest of the industry does.

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Or if you're into online gaming.

I have to fend off linux nerds with a bat. The bottom line is "that's cool and all but there are a lot of things that I can't do with linux and I'm not willing to make that big of a change"

[–] illi@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What are the issues? Genuine question.

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Not the person you replied to but they’re probably talking about anti-cheat

[–] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

What are the issues? Genuine question.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Man, I've been trying to migrate to Linux as my daily driver desktop over the last week. I love Linux passionately. But multi-monitor and 2.5Gb/s NIC support is just a disaster, basically to the point of completely unusable. It's so frustrating. It keeps pushing me back to Windows, because Windows just works when it comes to hardware.

[–] jrgd@lemm.ee 15 points 18 hours ago

For multi-monitor: use Wayland. For 2.5Gbps Ethernet NICs, they never work properly on any system in regard to performance, but I presume you are referencing the subpar Realtek NICs not connecting? Depending on the distro, you likely won't have the driver and/or firmware package preinstalled to make it work.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago

those are two of the easiest features to support.

what distro is giving you trouble?

[–] kmacmartin@lemmy.ca 9 points 20 hours ago

I run two multimonitor systems with different DPIs and 2.5gbe and they both run great. What issues are you hitting?

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Multi monitor issues are purely on your distro - and are pretty easy to fix. At least for me on arch and bspwm (I haven't touched a Debian based install or full DE in years), setup was as easy as making my randr script run when my WM starts up, I imagine it's even easier with a full DE.

For 2.5 gb/s internet... I've never run into any problems or even had to configure anything. Fresh barebones arch install with lan, 2.5 gb/s out of the box. If you're getting less (my guess is 1 gb/s?) it's almost certainly a hardware issue (motherboard/network card is only 1 gb/s, port on router and/or switch is 1 gb/s, etc)

If you're having trouble with something, I highly recommend searching for the problem after checking a relevant wiki (archwiki is an awesome resource if you're on arch). If you're having issues you can't find problems to, feel free to shoot me a message and I'll try to help you out. I'm no expert, but I've been exclusively on Linux for 3 years (since I graduated and no longer was required to be on windows at all) and haven't run into any issues that I didn't find a relatively easy fix for)

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago

This is very true. I remember back in the day I tossed my old drive full of viruses and windows and I started using Linux. That was 1998? No, it was definitely 2000 already. That was a really easy erase. I guess you could also just reuse the same drive. But that one has the click of death, so no.