this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
493 points (91.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4198 readers
1288 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Is the "help or reference" coming from other workers?

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It's coming from someone who dedicated their entire life to being smarter than you or me about electronics.

Go on. Give your opinion.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

At what point do they stop benefiting from their labor? They obviously can't keep working in the next things and the next thing. They might be a one trick pony. You would need robust social programs like ubi.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 21 hours ago

Is/was that person not a worker?

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

... It's coming from the culmination of, like 5 decades of absurdly educated engineering. If you want to call them workers, then sure.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They weren't workers? is this "absurdly educated engineering" like a magic ghost inhabiting the halls of Apple HQ? Is this "engineering" in the room with us right now?

Seriously, I fail to grasp the point you're trying to make here...

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world -4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

.......you do know what engineering is, right? It's... Definitely not a magic ghost inhabiting halls. It's learning physics, electronics, programming, and, well, engineering to create novel solutions to problems people have.

My point is that capitalism, for all of its failures, does indeed sometimes produce better things. You unequivocally hating on it, for no discernable reason; I I can't find a reason for that.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 21 hours ago

My point is that capitalism, for all of its failures, does indeed sometimes produce better things.

I've yet to see how capitalism has done that where other systems could not, though?

The capitalists are the ones who own Apple in the OP, so the designers using decades of research are still workers. Apple paying them a bunch to work together is what gets them to make the iphone, sure, but you can't say that no other system wouldn't have eventually had a similar invention

In fact, I'm quite certain that if we had a more anarchistic system instead of capitalism we'd have gotten phones or something similar sooner, as groups of nerds were working on them as early hobby projects but told to stop by their bosses and work on other more profitable shit instead

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

You do know that engineering doesn't exist independently, right? It comes from humans. And you know what those humans typically are? Workers.

My point is that capitalism, for all of its failures, does indeed sometimes produce better things. You unequivocally hating on it, for no discernable reason; I I can’t find a reason for that.

[Citation needed].

Workers produce better things. Have been doing it before capitalism and will be doing it after. There's no need for a leecher class above them.

I'm starting to think you're not just playing devil's advocate...

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world -5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

How will we educate those workers, in order to produce better things? I guess some "workers" will be smarter than others. More intelligent. Should we send those stupider workers to the fields? Make them work off their stupidity while the genius, better workers invent new machines?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

blinks

What does education have to do with anything? How does that even follow towards someone "sending them to the fields"? This is the mother of non-sequiturs...

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

what does education have to do with inventing anything?

  • db0 (paraphrased)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Do...do you think education itself exists because of Capitalism?!

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world -5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

No, and I never said that I did. Do I think that people are motivated to be educated and create things by capitalism? Yes, of course. It's provably happened on both of our lifetimes.

Does that make capitalism the best solution? No. But obviously you're gonna need to provide more data against it to convince other people. This is a weak argument.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Do I think that people are motivated to be educated and create things by capitalism?

People were motivated to be educated and create things long before capitalism and will be long after capitalism.

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world -5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I think I've already agreed to that fact. Which brings us back to: how should we pay for those people to be educated? Who should we choose to create things? What should we do with everybody else?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

how should we pay for those people to be educated?

We don't have to "pay" to be educated outside of the capitalist system. "Paying" for education is a capitalist thing. In fact, most places outside of the US don't expect people to pay to be educated. Even within capitalism, various people have found ways to make education and healthcare a public service. Imagine that...

Who should we choose to create things?

People who want to choose it themselves?

What should we do with everybody else?

"We" don't "do" anything with other people.

[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world -3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Well, no. Paying professors isn't free. Some places just hide their salaries in their tax money. But sure. Everyone gets education (I agree with this). Some people choose to be artists and... I guess they just fend for themselves?

Now, let's be absurd. Pretend I'M a artist. I made a blank canvas, and I'm willing to sell it.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 4 points 20 hours ago

They laugh at your notion of money but you do you bro, they invite you home to share some of the excess of food that has been harvested by the people that had an honest desire to feed their fellow humans, instead of... getting power through making art?

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Eventually the money to start the process comes from somewhere like a bank or private loans. Sure, the workers could fund the venture by themselves, but nobody wants to take that kind of risk. Taking a job at a company is basically paying money to avoid risk.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Workers take plenty of risk to change jobs, homes, and even countries for a new job. The risks they take are comparatively much more significant than a venture of a millionaire or billionaire capitalist. That risk is somehow not rewarded under capitalism. Not to mention that the capitalist "risk" is nothing more than a scare tactic

That aside, someone "putting in money" doesn't mean they were useful and deserve any credit. It just means that you have an unjust system where the actual innovators have to agree to be exploited to survive.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

once the Return of Investment has been made

It's extremely difficult to get started. I suppose I could live in a van down by the river and dumpster dive until I can make money from a product or service. However, many products and services require multiple workers to accomplish. If course businesses exploit workers and prevent competition. Those things should be addressed. However, it becomes extremely difficult to add a layer of fairness because some people will say that they deserve more than another person. Some people will get jobs based on who they know and who likes them. Does everyone get paid equally? Do you measure performance on some way? That creates competing interests and competition among workers. I worked in a shop under a "flat rate" system. It was constant bullshit with some guys doing anything they could to steal work from other guys. People would lie to get more work or bill customers for extra labor. It was a shit show.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

It's extremely difficult to get started.

But it would be easier to start if you got a fair amount for your labor and everyone you're going to work with pooled in.

However, it becomes extremely difficult to add a layer of fairness because some people will say that they deserve more than another person. Some people will get jobs based on who they know and who likes them. Does everyone get paid equally? Do you measure performance on some way? That creates competing interests and competition among workers.

The current system isn't fair either. Ultimately your boss decides what you get paid. They could be a benevolent dictator but they could also try to stiff you, you will never know. Now, we might not make it fair but we can definitely make it fairer. One way is democratization of the work place. Essentially everyone gets a say, say in how the revenue is split, say in who gets hired, say in whether there should be preformance metrics and if there should then also what those metrics should be.

And that's not some only theoretical idea, cooperatives are real life examples of this working. They aren't point by point as the examples I gave, but they do follow the concept of implementing democracy in the work place.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Does everyone get paid equally

Anarchist chad: Yes.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Entry to the market is a bigger obstacle than risk. You can't just make a phone at home from scraps. You need an army of workers and machines and supply chains and business relationships and licenses.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You don't actually have to have any of those things because you can have other companies make those parts for you and then even hire a company to assemble it for you. Apple doesn't make screens or tiny screws or batteries. At least they don't have to I'm not sure how their supply chain works. You could do presales on a site like Kickstarter and make the phone. The issue is getting enough people to buy it in order to make it viable as all of those companies are going to charge you a set up fee, so the more parts you buy, the lower the cost per part. You'd also have to design a phone that gives people a compelling reason to buy it. Selling stuff is hard probably harder than making the product itself. You'd also need the usual business overhead like an accountant and an attorney.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's still market entry as the biggest obstacle, rather than risk. Getting enough people to buy it in order to make it viable is, itself, a factor of how much can be invested in marketing the phone. Designing a phone still requires at least a team of workers, if not an army, because that requires designing both the phone and software in addition to making it all work together in a usable product.

You also can't just start up a phone company from a lemonade stand. You need starting capital. Hence, market entry.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I would start by making a dev board in an SBC form factor like the raspberry pi and use an os like graphene and make it compatible with Linux. You could sell that and have your backers do testing for you while you build the rest of the phone. Then once the phone was built you could try to build an os of your own.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm pretty sure your cobbled together hackathon project wouldn't be functional as a phone, cell towers wouldn't communicate with it and it wouldn't make calls. Also, where did you even get backers? How did you attract them and scam them out of their money? And now you're using them to outsource your labor team??

Market barriers are real.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I guess you don't realize that there is easy to use pcb design software that lets you lay out your components and it will automatically run the traces between the board layers. You can them send those files off to a board manufacturer who will also solder the components on for you for an additional cost. It's not prohibitively expensive. People do it all the time

https://youtu.be/zc3sPoqOFG8

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

People do not make functional DIY cell phones all the time.

I don't care if you can hack together something in your garage, it's not a phone unless it can make calls using cellular infrastructure. That requires licensing, contracts, and business connections to the providers.

A project like that is good for making shortwave radios to avoid Israel installing bombs on your battery, but not useful for this specific purpose outside of making a prototype model to maybe be able to beg for money from investors.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

You can buy this thingy

https://www.adafruit.com/product/1963

You could place similar circuitry on the same board as the soc and other stuff.

Here is a cellphone with off the shelf parts.

https://learn.adafruit.com/piphone-a-raspberry-pi-based-cellphone/overview

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's called a modem and a SIM card sweetie

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That's not a cell phone? Pretty sure you're stuck to an internet connection.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Pick one of the many chipsets that are used in Mobile devices. Slap that baby on the circuit board next to the processor and ram. I'm pretty sure your can get these packaged on a small surface mount board with shielding and everything on it already.

https://www.electronicproducts.com/top-10-5g-chipsets/