this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
107 points (85.0% liked)

World News

38797 readers
1934 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We've had some trouble recently with posts from aggregator links like Google Amp, MSN, and Yahoo.

We're now requiring links go to the OG source, and not a conduit.

In an example like this, it can give the wrong attribution to the MBFC bot, and can give a more or less reliable rating than the original source, but it also makes it harder to run down duplicates.

So anything not linked to the original source, but is stuck on Google Amp, MSN, Yahoo, etc. will be removed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, for example, just today (or maybe it was yesterday? Things get blurry after a while) somebody posted a Breitbart link.

Now, most of the Lemmy audience is smart enough to know Breitbart is bullshit, and I did remove the link when I saw it, but until I removed it, it was up with the MBFC bot making it clear to anyone who did not know that it was, in fact, bullshit.

We can't catch everything right away, so it's good having a bot mark these things.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wouldn't the fact that the Breitbart article had – if I recall correctly – a 25:10 upvote-downvote ratio by the time it was removed suggest that the MBFC bot was functionally useless in counteracting a disinformation source? Presumably because most people simply read a headline about Zelensky that wasn't negative, said "oh cool", upvoted without reading the article or looking at the source, and continued scrolling? And I can hardly imagine any of the 10 downvoters actually checked the MBFC bot; instead they noticed that it was Breitbart and downvoted because of its notoriety.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We discussed boiling the bot down to a tag on the posts, but apparently there was some technical limitation doing that? Frankly, it's a little over my head.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I've heard too that post/user flairs don't gel with ActivityPub for some reason. 😅

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 day ago

Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as numerous false claims. (M. Huitsing 6/18/2016) Updated (01/29/2022)

Yeah mbfc really doing heavy work showing how bad it is...