this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1201 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
3126 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Tbf, our teeth aren't bad. They just didn't evolve to consume so much sugar.

[–] DarkGamer@fedia.io 72 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From an evolutionary standpoint we just have to survive long enough to reproduce, if we can't eat past age of reproduction there's no evolutionary pressure to change that.

Thank goodness for modern dentistry.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That’s completely untrue.

Evolution applies to the entire lifespan — if we could “reproduce” but died in childbirth every time, our species would have gone extinct long ago.

Parents and grandparents also contribute greatly to the success of a child long long after they’re born, helping to ensure it also survives to reproductive age.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Generally sure. We've certainly evolved to want to be around for a while after reproduction though, for example human infants are completely worthless. That doesn't mean we need to be top notch, but we do need to exist sufficiently to get children to even the most brutal, basic independence.

Compare that to something that hatches then is already just adulting, like many reptiles.

I think the keyword is precocial vs altricial

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Especially considering how reliant we humans are on knowledge, without the previous generation teaching us we're pretty well doomed.

Old people would have been highly valued just because they're sitting on decades of knowledge and wisdom, in an age without permanent records of information grandma would have been the only source of information about the past, and would presumably spend most of their time just sharing that knowledge with everyone else.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They just didn’t evolve to consume so much sugar.

Bro, eating oranges puts our tooth enamel in a weakened state. If we were designed, it was by an idiot.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oranges do not naturally have that much sugar.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not the sugar, but the acid that our teeth can't handle.

The fact that healthy foods can't be consumed without a risk of harm is not an intelligent design.

I mean, even apples (i.e. "Garden of Eden") can promote the growth of plaque!

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, biblically speaking we weren't supposed to eat those apples.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If an all-knowing creator didn't want humans to eat fruit from a specific tree, he shouldn't have grown that tree in the only garden he had humans in.

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Missing the point of obedience by choice.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, right. The obedience only matters if you have to make yourself do it. It doesn't count if it's natural and painless and costs you nothing. Can't believe I forgot about that?

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't seem you believe in much. Be at peace with your natural choices. There will always be a cost

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have a ton I believe in.

I believe in being kind, I believe in helping others, I believe in the hardworking men and women in medicine. There's so many things I believe in that it would take forever to list it all.

I also believe that telling other people sanctimonious things like "Be at peace with your natural choices. There will always be a cost" is not only off-putting and self-aggrandizing, but exactly the kind of crap the Bible tells you not to do.

I'll leave you with some advice my favorite nun gave me when I was 12. No one left alive hasn't heard the message of Jesus Christ. There's no one left. So proselytizing the way the Bible commands you to do is almost impossible. Since you can reasonably assume most people who aren't Christian have reason not to be, the best way to reach them isn't by being a holier-than-thou preacher, it's by living the light of the word and showing non-Christians what that means. "Live by example, what Christ has done for you."

Because one of the other things I believe, is that genuine Christians, who follow their book, are some of the best people on Earth. But for every one of them, with a kind heart and forgiving words and judge-not-lest-ye-be-judged stamped on their lips, there's about three hundred assholes saying vaguely judgemental shit on the internet and to one another behind closed doors. The "cost" of which only serves to help close those hearts and minds further to any positive message the Bible encourages you to spread.

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We're on a forum my friend, there is no spirit here. I've made 2 small remarks and you somehow got me and my intent all figured out. Maybe everyone on the planet has heard at the very least the existence of the message. There is no room here to have any form of discussion on what that message can mean. But people are finding God, as adults, the way you've said, through intimate dialog and love.

I meant no disrespect. I merely said there's a cost no matter how you choose, or how life has been laid out before you, and to be at peace is a simple remark for your sarcasm. English is my second language. If this offended you, I apologize. This is lemmy. Hardly a platform to have any meaningful discussion on relationships with a God or religion. Or politics.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

ESL makes perfect sense!

I've adjusted how I read your comments with that knowledge.

"Be at peace" in English is considered an order, and isn't usually said out of kindness (at least not in America). Here, it can be read as a threat. Which I now know you didn't mean.

Have a lovely day, friend.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Yahweh and mind games. What an asshole. 😂

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cane and Abel tells us the gods don't like vegetable farmers, that want meat

Meat doesn't damage your teeth

Incidentally the damage from sugar is fermentation - it makes carbonic acid (the stuff that makes soda fizzy) which is a weaker acid than citric

Citrus didn't make it to Europe quickly - it came from China

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually a bigger contributor is underdeveloped jaws due to no longer requiring to chew from.a very young age for nutritional requirements.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would stronger Jaws prevent teeth decay?

[–] kittehx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

Half our expected lifetime was our expected lifetime back when they evolved. Teeth are doing quite well, all things considered.