this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
773 points (97.2% liked)

memes

9901 readers
2536 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 65 points 2 days ago (6 children)

i haven't used chrome in over ten years. i could never understand why anyone the least bit nerdy would use it, but that's autism for ya

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have run Ungoogled Chromium, Thorium, and Vivaldi, and all of them perform much faster and better than Librewolf.

And Librewolf is my daily driver.

[–] mrbaby@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FF has been my daily driver for at least a decade, but I gotta test my web apps in everything :/

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kinda prefer Vivaldi for testing chromium-based browsers. I guess MS Edge would be a similar experience too nowadays

[–] mrbaby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Vivaldi is so pretty, I hide pretty much everything from the interface and use it for making product demo and training videos. I considered using it as a daily but I've got FF set up just the way I like it.

I draw the line at installing edge on my linux machine! I just figure that if chrome works then edge works and haven't had anyone report any issues.

Safari is the real pain in the butt..

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Honestly? I'm lazy, my adblocker still works so that's enough for me

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tab groups. I switched from Chrome to Firefox when all this Manifest V3 stuff started, and I'm still looking for a Firefox extension that works as well and looks as clean as the way Chrome handles tab grouping.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Firefox has panorama and supports browser groups which swap the whole visble tab bar. Lots of options.

[–] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Neither of those are nearly as effective though

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Chromium does have a clean UI. I still use Librewolf but the Firefox UI is a mess

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What UI? Both browsers render one line with tabs and the address bar below. They're almost identical.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

For reals. This is the browser equivalent of being concerned that your car only has 14-way adjustable seats instead of 16, or whatever the marketing team dreamed up last year.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at the screen usage though. It wastes a lot of space.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Alt-tabbing back and forth, chrome's combined tabs, address, and bookmarks bar is larger than Firefox 's...?

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What exactly is "clean" about a ui that doesnt conform to the os ui standards..? The ui is basically bloated because of it.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

To me, the Chromium UI looks and feels like a toy...

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Could you be more specific? I've been using ff regularly for a long time now and never feel like the UI is getting in the way, though I do use a tab groups add-on to help manage my mess of open tabs. But I also haven't used Chrome for even longer than I've been using ff, so I'm curious about what specific ways you think the chrome ui is better.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All the buttons and menu options are huge

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my UI (on desktop), tabs take up the title bar and all the other necessary buttons fit in the row with the address field. I've also got a bookmarks bar below that but it's optional. There's also the optional sidebar that I do use but mostly keep hidden.

For menus, there's the tab menu that is a button on the tab row and is mostly filled with open tabs plus 4 other items. Then there's the main menu with 19 items. Tbf, one is undesired (log in for sync) and at least 7 are redundant (as in if they weren't there, I'd still have easy access to their functionality), but I find menus are easier to discover features through (and hate how MS wants to get rid of them) and am ok with the redundancy.

There's also various context menus, but I've never found them to be obtrusive.

This is the state after some customization, but not a crazy amount. If I install FF on a new system, I can usually get it to a point where I'm happy with it pretty quickly.

If you mean the mobile version, I can understand that a bit more but personally prefer the screen space to be used up to expose more functionality. On mobile, I've felt like FF gives me the most power that feels closest to what I can do on a desktop, though tbf it's been a while since I used other browsers (excluding electron stuff or apps that integrate Chrome or Google Web view for web browsing rather than letting me use my preferred browser, though I've never felt happy with the more minimalist UI instead of the capabilities FF exposes).

I also haven't tried librewolf and don't know if the same UI is possible there.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

I actually like the UI of the mobile version. I am also used to Firefox at this point but when I first moved it was painful. I think they should polish up the UI and focus on minimalism I stead of cramming in new features