FabledAepitaph

joined 1 year ago
[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

I will continue to never give Nintendo any of my money on account of their litigiousness.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

I'm going to vote even harder

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah, 100% the cop's fault. If a person feels it's better to shoot an innocent bystander in the head than risk being stabbed, then they're in the wrong line of work. Get out and let someone with better judgement have a go.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

How else will the cops plant drugs in your car if you don't roll your windows down? Duh

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you're telling me they give the police incentive to shoot people, as a game, to send people to jail for even longer, because they think it's fun and hilarious?

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think anybody who is sex trafficked for a year should legally get a freebie. Anybody who is willing to abuse or sex traffic another human being should just be at peace with the possibility of being ended by their victims. Good thing I don't make the laws, I guess?

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Help me build my echo chamber."

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Agreed. Not everybody can or wants to own a home even with a 25k bonus. Some people want the freedom to move around and explore without being bound for any more than a monthly or yearly term.

The solution is to pump up availability and let the prices correct themselves. Bind pay CEO as a multiple of their employee wages, and address economic shenanigans like stock buybacks and tax loopholes so that people end up with a larger piece of the pie--that way people can do what they want instead of being forced into one option or another.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I thought Google was so cool around 2004. Now I can't wait for them to become irrelevant. I need to stop using "googling" as a verb...

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One of the fundamental principals of the RCRA is that dilution is not an allowable solution to pollution. Otherwise, you could just say that any amount of pollution is below applicable concentrations after it mixed into the oceans, atmosphere, whatever. And any company could emit as much as they wanted as long as they diluted it. Oil spills could simply be left alone because they'd eventually distribute throughout the earth.

Concentrations must be considered as they occur in their process streams. The process stream must meet certain requirements first and foremost, and it must be further checked to see if that could significantly affect the air or water in which it is emitted, just to make sure its good to go since water flow, temperature, and wildlife migration change throughout the year. The same is true for air emissions as well.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Forgotten benefits of gasoline: you can fix it yourself and you're not locked into a shiny new consumerist downward spiral that demands you buy a new vehicle every ten years when the car can't go 200 miles in a single charge anymore? And the next guy who gets the battery powered vehicle is just worse off than you were, as the poorer along us suffer even worse condition vehicles and the risk of massive expenses in the way of new battery failure. Why is nobody concerned with the fact that batteries are going to lock us into excess and unavoidable consumerism as they degrade? Engines -might- fail, but batteries -will- fail.

List one battery powered device that isn't basically disposable.

1
Outer Wilds Inspired Piece (psv4.userapi.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world to c/outerwilds@lemmy.world
 

Found this piece that I thought you guys might enjoy. Here's the artist's profile: https://vk.com/satan_sect

view more: next ›