Asklemmy

43573 readers

1860 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

104

Using a Firefox fork makes any difference? (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 days ago by NONE_dc@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Well, Mozilla seems to be making some pretty questionable decisions, So I'm considering switching browsers for the third (Is it the third?) time. The thing is, I really like the way Firefox works, so I've been trying out the more famous Forks like Waterfox and Librewolf, although I'm going for Floorp. However, I'm wondering: is using a fork enough? I mean, they are Forks maintained by other people, but is there a chance that whatever Mozilla does to Firefox could affect those Forks? Should I jump to a totally different browser like Vivaldi?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don’t give a fuck about ads. And so should my browser.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But the people employed to create content on all the websites and YouTube channels you use regularly care quite a great deal about advertisement or they’d have to do something else for a living.

What, you don’t use free services online?

[–] funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have YouTube premium, so that part of my money is distributed to those creators. I also have subscriptions for news sites, podcasts and comics through Patreon and other services.

And to be clear: I don’t have a single problem with advertising — I have a huge problem with tracking me wherever I go online. When I’m on a site for Japanese language learning, show me ads for flights to Japan but stop tracking every website I visit.

I am paying for the services I use.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 2 points 4 days ago

We sound similar. I’ve also been happy to pay for the services I use.

Although I hope you’ll agree that your second comment is a lot more moderated than the first :)

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then your browser will have no money to develop itself.

[–] funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I am donating regularly to Firefox and Thunderbird. It’s a myth that software can only exist through ads and tracking.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Somehow I doubt you're giving them as much as Google is. I despise ads but the current market realities mean that developing and maintaining a browser engine is not feasible without corporation-level resources.

[–] funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, we‘ll never know as Mozilla has never tried to create user financed software since Netscape Navigatior Gold, IIRC.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

We know because no one else is doing it.