this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
321 points (94.5% liked)

Political Memes

5308 readers
2408 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 27 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

This is kind of tangential, but I wish people would make distinction between Marxism and Leninism. Marx didn't say shit about the vanguard party. Imo, we can reject Leninism without having to reject Marxism.

Also don't waste your time arguing with me, because I am woefully uneducated and stupid, but I can only work with what I have, ya know?

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

But he did write quite extensively on Lumpenproletariat.

vagabonds, discharged soldiers, discharged convicts, runaway galley slaves, swindlers, charlatans, pickpockets, tricksters, gamblers, procurers, brothel keepers, porters, intellectuals, organ grinders, rag-pickers, knife-grinders, tinkers, beggars; in short, the entirely undefined, disintegrating mass, thrown hither and yon, which the French call la bohème.

That is quite a few groups he considered subhuman, where half the ‘cleansing’ operations under communism have derived their theoretical excuses from.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago

The point of the Lumpenproletariat isn't that they're subhuman, it's that they lack cohesiveness as a class or revolutionary potential.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's the mechanical gaps in Marxist philosophy which arguably led to Leninist revisionism in that first era.

The annoying part is that there is now like 100 year of post-Lenin philosophy which MLs love to ignore because the thing they actually care about is relitigating 100 year old geopolitics.

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

I don't think many people on lemmy conflate marxism with leninism outside of .ml, and even there folks seems to see leninism as something on top of marxism and not inherently mixed.

And then we also have people who feel stalinist style "communo facism" would work well because everyone you like will be fed and everyone you don't like will be dead. I don't think anyone ever liked those people, including themselves.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 5 points 9 hours ago

TBF even Leninism is a stark departure from what MLs believe.

If you look at the original plans for the Soviet Union, Lenin was basically planning a Syndicalist Representative-Democracy. Problem was that Lenin got too bogged down in crushing any chance that said democracy would vote against itself, and then Stalin just decided to go full corporate town with it.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

You're absolutely not wrong. MLs are a... stark departure from Marx.