this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
1047 points (93.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26428 readers
2955 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

Lemmy: Fuck cars!

Lemmy: Fuck the police!

Lemmy, when someone sabotages the most viable alternative to traffic stops to prevent people from speeding: Yes very good. This is good for society.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The most viable alternative to traffic stops is a narrow chicane with solid bollards on either side, although oher traffic calming devices are available.

Traffic cameras exist to generate revenue, not to make the streets safer. Intersections with red light cameras almost always have shorter yellow lights, to increase revenue while making the intersection less safe.

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Traffic Cameras can and do reduce speeding if implemented properly

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are less effective than traffic calming.

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I agree, but I'm pointing out that they do indeed help if implemented correctly

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

What is "implemented properly" and how often does it happen?

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

No. Traffic cameras in your area are there to generate revenue.

The camera being covered here is not at an intersection so your offtopic comment about revenue is irrelevant. This is a camera on a stretch of road where drivers usually speed, the cameras are painted bright yellow to make them obvious and do a far better job of getting people to slow for hazardous corners than a sign ever did.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In California the duration of yellow is determined by a formula incorporating the roads speed limit. If yellow light duration is less than the formula would set, the traffic ticket is dismissed. I'm guessing most states have a similar law.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, and and those laws are frequently violated to farm more tickets.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

And good luck getting a judge to hear your side of it. Not impossible, but then you're missing a day of work for a maybe...

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Another reason for a dash cam.

[–] WordBox@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Source on speeding cameras working for anything other than revenue generation?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that were the case, they would be hidden.

They are a deterrent for speeding most of all.

[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The ones around here, everyone just slows down getting to that intersection, and then picks up speed again after crossing through

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the main purpose of that cams. Slow drivers on strategic spots that have more chances of accidents.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

That does make sense. Never thought of it that way.

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the UK (Where the op picture is) the police cannot collect the revenue from cameras and other fines. It all goes to the gov so the cops have zero financial incentive to install speed cameras.

[–] SSJMarx@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

money goes to the government

cops get their money from the government

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but they get the same amount regardless of the fines. The police see no direct financial connection.

[–] SSJMarx@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

Unless the police are an entirely independent organization, they can still receive orders from the top directing them to seek out fines even if they're not the ones who directly benefit.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is this not "fuck the police" it's a camera, controlled by the police, to surveil people.

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It only surveils idiots who are speeding.

Why is this not fuvk people who put pedestrians, cyclists and other drivers in danger

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

How do cameras make any difference?

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dunno if you've tried, but I'm here to tell ya, cobble stone streets will absolutely stop speeding really quick.

[–] Norkos@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, just observed it on this weekend on a cobble stone street in very bad condition. It was a 30 km/h zone and other drivers where more about 50.

While I, who only had a driver's license for 3 months, tried not to break the suspension of my car (obviously unfounded).

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

So it doesn't work because your sample size = 1?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Traffic cameras ARE the police...

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Speed traps are just a tool to further monetize and rent seek car culture in the absence of public transit.

You can, in fact, hate both cars and infrastructure that exists solely to make using a car more expensive.

the most viable alternative to traffic stops

I have never heard of a town that reduced the size of its police force after installing a speed trap.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They do not exist solely to collect revenue, although they certainly do that as well. They have been proven time and again to reduce speeding and fatalities, as other commenters in this thread have pointed out. As far as using traffic cameras to reduce police forces, I haven't been able to find that exactly, but there are plenty of examples of deploying traffic cameras to work around a shortage of officers which works out to the same thing.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 1 week ago

You know what else would reduce police forces? Eliminating car traffic entirely.

Cops spend the most time on ordinary traffic stops.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Shitposts!? On MY shitposting community!?? It's more likely than you think!

[–] theonetruedroid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Lemmy users can believe in different things. We need differing opinions or it just stifles a website.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

LaLuzDelSol (on Lemmy): thinks Lemmy is one person

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Why do I keep talking to myself and contradicting every other thing I say?

(Taking this to its logical conclusion, in case I forget why I wrote this when I read it later and feel like arguing with myself about it)

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I generalize ofc but those are definitely the prevailing viewpoints, which seem contradictory.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Better rule: when someone sabotaged surveillance state infrastructure, don’t post footage of them doing it

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 1 week ago

Lemmy try not to post crimes challenge - impossible. Granted, as far as crimes go, this one seems innocuous enough, but still.

I've been told repeatedly on c/piracy that lemmy is just too small to attract the attention of law enforcement and three-letter agencies

Paradoxically, I've also been told that lemmy is rife with state-sponsored troll farms, so....?

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago

Those are different kinds of lemmings

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Narrowing roads and making them less straight also lowers speeding

[–] cows_are_underrated 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For reasonable people yes, but those that go 30km/h over the speed limit every time don't care and will always drive as fast as possible in those sections. I once met a guy who claimed to know down to the exact last km/h how fast he could drive until the car lost control in every single curve of a quite curvy road segment. Is it save to drive like that? Absolutely fucking not. Does he car(e)? Also absolutely fucking not.

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

People like that are gonna cause accidents anyways.

Studies have shown that accidents are more likely to be severe/fatal on wide, straight roads.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Speed cameras also won't stop someone like that. Though they might take nice pictures of the wreck.