this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
52 points (75.0% liked)

Work Reform

9798 readers
407 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/MoGwg

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 52 points 2 months ago (3 children)

He said unconditional cash grants deterred people from working and reaping the benefits of success.

Just like the wealthy people who keep working after they've made enough to live the rest of their life on the interest.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

Or their children, who didn't even work to get to that point. If unconditional cash grants are bad, outlaw inheritance; it's just an unconditional cash grant awarded by genetic lottery. If working for success it's so paramount, make everyone do it.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure it's wrong, too. Every UBI trial I've seen has people improving their lives. Some get lifted into work. Some get necessary training. A very high percentage have their life and status improved, better than welfare.

Ramsey can duck right off with his bullshit.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Those who only ever act out of greed and selfishness always believe these are the only reasons anyone could ever be motivated to act. The notion that people could work because they like it, or because it helps others, or because they would rather be active than inactive, is out of reach of their imaginations.