this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
354 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3096 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite US dominance in so many different areas of technology, we're sadly somewhat of a backwater when it comes to car headlamps. It's been this way for many decades, a result of restrictive federal vehicle regulations that get updated rarely. The latest lights to try to work their way through red tape and onto the road are active-matrix LED lamps, which can shape their beams to avoid blinding oncoming drivers.

From the 1960s, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards allowed for only sealed high- and low-beam headlamps, and as a result, automakers like Mercedes-Benz would sell cars with less capable lighting in North America than it offered to European customers.

A decade ago, this was still the case. In 2014, Audi tried unsuccessfully to bring its new laser high-beam technology to US roads. Developed in the racing crucible that is the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the laser lights illuminate much farther down the road than the high beams of the time, but in this case, the lighting tech had to satisfy both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Food and Drug Administration, which has regulatory oversight for any laser products.

The good news is that by 2019, laser high beams were finally an available option on US roads, albeit once the power got turned down to reduce their range.

NHTSA's opposition to advanced lighting tech is not entirely misplaced. Obviously, being able to see far down the road at night is a good thing for a driver. On the other hand, being dazzled or blinded by the bright headlights of an approaching driver is categorically not a good thing. Nor is losing your night vision to the glare of a car (it's always a pickup) behind you with too-bright lights that fill your mirrors.

This is where active-matrix LED high beams come in, which use clusters of controllable LED pixels. Think of it like a more advanced version of the "auto high beam" function found on many newer cars, which uses a car's forward-looking sensors to know when to dim the lights and when to leave the high beams on.

Here, sensor data is used much more granularly. Instead of turning off the entire high beam, the car only turns off individual pixels, so the roadway is still illuminated, but a car a few hundred feet up the road won't be.

Rather than design entirely new headlight clusters for the US, most OEMs' solution was to offer the hardware here but disable the beam-shaping function—easy to do when it's just software. But in 2022, NHTSA relented—nine years after Toyota first asked the regulator to reconsider its stance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (5 children)

All you need is to have all car's lights be horizontally polarized and then all windshields have a vertical polarizer there I've fixed the problem.

Now basically the light would come out and only vertical polarizer light or scattered light would be accepted by everyone's windshields. If you've ever played with this setup on your own using a flashlight and polarizer shades, the color of almost all objects look so cool.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And pedestrians and cyclists?

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So long as they are wearing polarized glasses they too can join in on the fun.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was walking the dogs at five am when I realized the impracticality of this statement. You are suggesting people wear sunglasses at night so automobile drivers don't have to slow down to a speed safe for the conditions. Just don't overdrive your headlights so you can safely see and react to anything (cyclists, pedestrians, livestock, rhythm pigs, critters in the road)

Also retrofitting all front and back windshields of all existing vehicles on the road.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's practical. The polarizers don't have to be sunshade just polarizing. There's a little attenuation but it's by no means a dark shade. Obviously you are tossing away half the light plus the light Absorbed by the glasses. It can be gradually phased in over the usual 13 years of full fleet replacement.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Half the light plus are functionally sunglasses and would be hazardous for a pedestrian to be wearing in the dark. The only time a pedestrian would be able to see is when a vehicle was illuminating the area.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You could be wearing a flashlight also with a polarizer on it? The street lights could also be made polarized.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe you've veered into possible but far from practical territory.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I hear you but I rarely if ever walk outside at night and if I do I walk only well lit streets. Like the situation where I have a pressing need to walk outside while it's super dark without a lamp is just dumb. In some places it's illegal to walk outside without a flash light outside....I'm almost so sure I could Google it.

[–] superkret 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fuck cyclists, pedestrians and residents, I guess.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

No, everyone can wear polarizer gear and benefit. But if they didn't, it would be just like now.

[–] notapantsday 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh that is such a cool idea! Wouldn't even need the whole windscreen to be polarized, polarized glasses for the driver should also work.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks I found out about it accidentally looking for ways to control reflections on photos.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

I found out about it by being unable to use my laptop with sunnies unless I rotate the sunnies or the screen. Yet another lcd downside, should've got an old lmao

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

The ol' DMG Gameboy tech.

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also, make sure that all reflectors are turning the polarisation by 90°

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A simple regulation can create a standard to establish all the required changes and suddenly you'll be able to see the road finally.

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And finally I will be able to use eye protectors when cycling at night.
Right now, it just increases the lens flare and even getting expensive ones will, at most, not increase lens flare.