this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
423 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4559 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In policy proposals posted to her website, Harris called for an increase in the overall minimum wage and for the end of the subminimum wage for tipped workers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seraph@fedia.io 101 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It does feel like we should be encouraging the end of tipping, not asking it to stick around forever.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Removing the minimum wage exception to tips does help with that. Part of the reason why tips are inventived

Plus taxes on tips as they exist already has quite a number of assumptions that tipping will always exist. For instance, assumptions of a minimum 8% tip rate for reporting. Which will be withheld from pay from at least that assumption (which you can get back if you earn less by filling)

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wouldn't the elimination of taxes on tips entrench that non-taxable income as something servers would die before ever surrendering? Treating it as income means that whether that money is coming from hourly vs. tips is irrelevant and, at the end of the day, hourly compensation is always more reliable if all else is equal.

[–] Seraph@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

This was my concern, but if y'all think servers will give up their tax free tips... sure...

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, it would.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

It would be preferrable to change the tax code on it differently, yes, but unfortunately in elections that going to be difficult to explain to people rather than the much simpler "no taxes on tips"

Mind you that trump has the same plan on tips tax removal here but without any of the minimum wage change stuff

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You think the tax coming off their tips is enough to make servers indifferent to them?

If they are guaranteed minimum wage then at least I can feel like they aren't going to starve if I don't tip the ever increasing suggested tip %.

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

A server can easily work 4-5 tables an hour. Assuming average bill of $50 per table, and average of 10% tips, that's $20-25 per hour. That average is most likely higher because of people like you who feel guilty and use the suggested tips lol.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

PLEASE ENTER YOUR TIP PREFERENCE HERE

25% 28% 35%

^skip^

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Swivel the ipad 360° and walk away

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Wouldn't that just point it back at you?

Also they just pick the tip amount then.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I agree, and we'd have to do it carefully so tipped workers continue making roughly the same as they do now.

Where I live a handful of trendy restaurants announced opened as no-tipping restaurants. They would add a 20% gratuity to every bill and claim it was used "to support a living wage and benefits" to the staff. Usually it was just sucked up into the revenue pile and used however the owner wanted.

If restaurants dropped tipping, raised their prices by 20%, and paid their staff 20% more, I would be okay with that. In the European countries I've visited, it seems to work just fine and food is still cheaper than where I live.