this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

196

16215 readers
2214 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (7 children)
[–] rosa666parks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)
[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

While topically interesting, a lot of those graphs are either saying the same thing or are misinterpreting an exponential.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yup this is left wing pseudo science instead of right wing pseudo science. These are just some graphs that don't prove anything without a scientific paper to back it up.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

"pseudo science"

It's a website with "wtf" in its name, chill. It just shows the degradation of purchase power firstly as a consequence of the 70s oil crisis, and then as a consequence of increased neoliberalism.

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Well what you’re calling left wing psudoscience is an article by Economic Policy Institute: https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/

They explain their methodology and data sources in meticilous detail, even more so in their report on how they do; https://www.epi.org/publication/understanding-the-historic-divergence-between-productivity-and-a-typical-workers-pay-why-it-matters-and-why-its-real/

If that’s not enough here’s some more stuff:

https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/135/2/645/572126

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2008/wp08185.pdf

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)