this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
250 points (87.9% liked)

Not The Onion

12378 readers
729 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 216 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is a fluff piece written by someone in a rich bubble.

The 2 year old and 4 year old have no concept of money, the 4 year old did not "do most of the work" in a lemonade stand, and they do not have "their own money" to spend. Picking up after yourself and putting dishes in the sink are not chores, and kids this age aren't taking out the trash - of course they enjoy it when mummy does it and makes a big deal of how grown up the kids are for helping, and probably rewards then for it.

None of the ideas are innovative or relevant to most parents, and particularly not with a kids that age. This is just one rich bored parent with young kids sharing their "experiences". Pretty out of touch with reality.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 65 points 2 months ago (25 children)

$150 a month for her dog's health insurance...

And she's calling herself "middle class" like she lives in the burbs....

The wealthy always think of themselves as "middle class" because they know people wealthier.

Just because billionaires exist doesn't mean millionaires who take annual child free vacations are suddenly "middle class".

They just don't want to actually admit they're wealthy and wasting a shit ton of money that should be going to taxes.

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I worry that she actually is "middle class" and the wealth disparity has moved to the point that those of us who cannot spend $150 on pet insurance or drop $750,000+ on a house or $100,000 on a truck are effectively "poor", at least as far as the market is concerned.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

There's people with "Fuck you" money and people without "Fuck you" money.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, it should be median income/wealth, then a standard deviation either way.

But capitalism doesn't care about people, it cares about money. That's the only way the "middle class" can be defined differently.

Don't let capitalism define words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Where does she claim to be middle class? It seems she recognizes she was middle class as a kid, but now is not, considering she said "were" instead of "are."

I have a very different take away from this and that she knows she is wealthy, and trying to impart the understanding of their luck onto her kids...I don't see her at all denying her wealth.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tinks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Erm, not arguing that this lady is middle class, but dog insurance cost is not remotely relevant to that lol. I pay that for my dog and make less than 6 figures. My dog is just really important to me, and our last dog cost us thousands and thousands of dollars on vet bills. I'm not going to be blindsided dropping $5k in a day on vet bills again. Our dog has insurance because it seems like the financially responsible thing to do, especially when your dog is extremely active and engaging in sports that it may be injured doing.

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So-called upper middle class: "I'm middle class because there are people richer than me"

So-called lower middle class: "I'm middle class because there are people poorer than me"

IMO the middle class is an illusion

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Middle class is paycheck to paycheck, has been for a while.

I'm lucky enough I can stack retirement and I got a house when it was (comparatively cheap).

If we're splitting the classes by median income (assets could be done, but people in the middle class by median are lucky to even have a mortgage on a home) then it's about 40k for an individual and 75k for a household. And I'm solidly "upper class" even though I'll never amass more than a million in assets unless real estate inflation jumps past Ludacris and into plaid.

The fact that anyone with a million in assets, let alone cash/stocks would consider themselves "middle class" just tells you stupid people can luck out and become millionaires.

It's a level of delusion that is actual impressive.

So the "middle class" that's a single income, house in the burbs, two cars, vacations every year...

That shits gone. But that doesn't mean there isn't still a statistical middle class.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you're living paycheck to paycheck, you aren't middle class.

You might not be poor but definitely not middle.

Anyone who thinks that's middle class has just been fooled by the wealthy to make them think they're doing better than they are

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You have an idea in your head of a standard that is "middle class".

That is not what I'm talking about.

If we’re splitting the classes by median income (assets could be done, but people in the middle class by median are lucky to even have a mortgage on a home) then it’s about 40k for an individual and 75k for a household.

Statistically speaking "middle class" is the median and a statistical deviation either way.

But that paints an incredibly depressing and realistic picture of what America's "economy" is really like. So the wealthy have pushed the narrative you're following that only a minority of people can obtain "middle class".

Historically when shit gets organized like that, it doesn't end well for the ones that hoarded all the wealth.

The harsh truth is that "middle class" is pretty fucking broke. It's just what happens when you concentrate the wealth at one end of the distribution. And literally the only way to fix that, is by moving the wealth to people lower in the distribution.

So rather than that be the discussion, it benefits the wealthy if people do what you're doing, and act like it just disappeared and can magically be made to reappear from thin air without taking wealth back from the people who have it now.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Simply taking a statistical look ignores what it was for centuries before. Middle class is more than just income, it's what that income means for your lifestyle and ability and it has been eroded as you say and will need to be taken back, but people fooling themselves into thinking they are just because of their income are in a bracket.

Oh you earn the middle income? Too bad it's 90% of your rent but don't worry you're still middle class! Nothing to be worried about here!

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You're right. Middle class to me means owning a home or at least paying well on a mortgage. One car per person. Vacation money. Fun money. Paycheck to paycheck will never be middle class to me just because it's the statistical median. This is what people mean when they say the middle class is disappearing. The majority of Americans are working class, poor, or destitute. There's a fraction that are middle class and up.

In this stupid article the author says she was middle class but her parents often couldn't afford pizza. That is not middle class. Am I fucking crazy here?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Oh you earn the middle income? Too bad it’s 90% of your rent but don’t worry you’re still middle class! Nothing to be worried about here!

I'm not saying that's fine, I've literally said multiple times it's not, and that looking at like you are downplays the problem.

I'm sorry I couldn't find a better way to explain it.

[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't afford $150 for my own health insurance

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yep, people keep replying like it's a choice to pay it or not...

For most Americans, that shit ain't a choice, they just can't.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

What if how she lives is the way middle class should be? Like, we want to create a system where most people live this way (or have the option to).

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Depends on your measure of middle, I bet median would be pretty low but average is still probably way higher than most people.

Wealth gap has never been worse

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I make less than 100k a year and my dogs insurance costs about that much. I didn't have insurance for him before because he was young and healthy but then he tore his ACL and the surgery set me back 6.5K. That wasn't exactly a drop in the bucket for me, at the time I had less than half of that in savings, and had to max out my credit card. So now yeah it sucks having to pay that much but if he does get a bad injury or illness - obviously I really hope that doesn't happen and I have him for many more years to come - as he grows older, it will cost me way less as a lump sum.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

"Look! My kids are almost like other kids, except they're spoiled-wealthy-at-birth!"

--businessinsider.com

[–] Emmie@lemmings.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Every parent wants to spoil their kids. So they have it better than they had at their age. It’s just how it is. Your parents couldn’t afford Lego? You will buy the biggest set etc

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yep mine have a shitload of legos, plus the power wheels cars that I never got to have as a kid

Definitely not every parent.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I looked for past articles from her on Business Insider. She is middle class, like rest of us. Which middle class person doesn't hire an accountant and spend $1000 per month to make parenting easy!

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago

Hello fellow middle-class citizens!

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Lol, have you seen the cost of daycare... $1000 per month easy in most cities. Probably not what you meant, but it still made me laugh.

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

She has a job and 2 kids in child care age. $25 a day seems reasonable even cheap to maintain her career. And if an accountant can pay for themselves on a journalists salary then she should right?