this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
52 points (90.6% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3564 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

A hardcore second amendment voter will usually resist any and all measures that restrict firearm possession, often on the basis of slippery slope arguments. Since the basis is rooted in a classic logical fallacy, they can be very difficult to persuade.

You're right though, Biden has been fairly moderate on gun control. So was Obama though, and you remember how they reacted to him?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree about gun zealotry, but if those are your two issues:

  1. Biden has said he does not want to restrict most guns, but he does want to protect children.

Trump instituted gun control measures over his administration, and as with everything else has said he supports gun control and says he doesn't support gun control depending on which crowd he's talking to.

I guess you can consider that a wash.

  1. But racial Justice? Clearly Biden all the way.

On those two points, biden's clearly ahead.

If that guy is still undecided, then he cares significantly more about guns than he cares about racial justice or national leadership.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, I am not that guy for the record. But if you read the article it said he automatically rejects any candidate that advocates for gun control. So, that means Biden is flat out for him, along with pretty much the whole dem party.

The amusing part to me personally was that such a person would normally just vote gop. But that specific guy cannot, for fairly obvious reasons.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Biden advocates for gun control and restricted gun access.

Dumps advocates for gun control and restricted gun access.

I think people just assume dumps is pro second amendment since he switched to the Republicans.

Ah well.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump did more than that; he advocated for simply seizing guns without due process. He's worse than Biden from a second amendment perspective, not equal!

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Thank you, that is a great point.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Why the fuck would a hardcore second amendment voter ever consider supporting Donald "take the guns first" Trump, though‽

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Obama signed legislation which expanded gun rights and allowed concealed carry in national parks.

Republicans spent his next 2 terms saying Obama will ban access to guns…

None of this is based in reality.