Linux

48364 readers

373 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

379

Linus Torvalds Begins Expressing Regrets Merging Bcachefs (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 3 months ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There's been some Friday night kernel drama on the Linux kernel mailing list... Linus Torvalds has expressed regrets for merging the Bcachefs file-system and an ensuing back-and-forth between the file-system maintainer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Looks dead on arrival to me, so much complexity for "performance" but the filessystem is outclassed by everything else in existence. If there was any real performance from this complexity it could have cool niche use cases but this is very disappointing https://www.phoronix.com/review/bcachefs-linux-67/2

[–] apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Brand new anything will not show up with amazing performance, because the primary focus is correctness and features secondary.

Premature optimisation could kill a project's maintainability; wait a few years. Even then, despite Ken's optimism I'm not certain we'll see performance beating a good non-cow filesystem; XFS and EXT4 have been eeking out performance for many years.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cow is an excuse for writing performance, though the read is awful too currently

[–] apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A rather overly simplistic view of filesystem design.

More complex data structures are harder to optimise for pretty much all operations, but I'd suggest the overwhelmingly most important metric for performance is development time.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

At the end of the day the performance of a performance oriented filesystem matters. Without performance, it's just complexity

[–] babeuh@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It has gotten better since November of last year though, here's a more recent benchmark showing it beating btrfs quite often: https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-611-filesystems/2

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 3 months ago

Improvement is nice to see, still not ready for prime time