this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
832 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19171 readers
1433 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Beanie@programming.dev 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's half-right. Upper-case letters aren't pluralised with apostrophes but lower-case letters are. (So the plural of 'R' is 'Rs' but the plural of 'r' is 'r's'.) With numbers (written as '123') it's optional - IIRC, it's more popular in Britain to pluralise with apostrophes and more popular in America to pluralise without. (And of course numbers written as words are never pluralised with apostrophes.) Acronyms are indeed not pluralised with apostrophes if they're written in all caps. I'm not sure what you mean by decades.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

By decades they meant "the 1970s" or "the 60s"

I don't know if we can rely on British popularity, given y'all's prevalence of the "greengrocer's apostrophe."

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Never heard of the greengrocer's apostrophe so I looked it up. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-a-greengrocers-apostrophe-1690826

I absolutely love that there's a group called the Apostrophe Protection Society. Is there something like that for the Oxford Comma? I'd gladly join them!

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

I will die on both of those hills alongside you.

[–] Beanie@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hah, I do not like the greengrocer's apostrophe. It is just wrong no matter how you look at it. The Oxford comma is a little different - it's not technically wrong, but it should only be used to avoid confusion.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

I use it for fun, frivolity, and beauty.

[–] Beanie@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh right - that would be the same category as numbers then. (Looked it up out of curiosity: using apostrophes isn't incorrect, but it seems to be an older/less formal way of pluralising them.)

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Now, plurals aside, which is better,

The 60s

Or

The '60s

?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] bisby@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because otherwise if you have too many small letters in a row it stops looking like a plural and more like a misspelled word. Because capitalization differences you can make more sense of As but not so much as.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

As

That looks like an oddly capitalised "as"

That really gives the reason it's acceptable to use apostrophes when pluralising that sort of case

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not stupid. It's just the bastard child of Germany, Dutch, French, Celtic and Scandinavian and tries to pretend this mix of influences is cool and normal.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Victim blaming and ableism!

The French and Scandinavian bits were NOT consensual.

(Don't forget Latin btw)

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

There are plenty of non Norman consensual French words and the Danes had as much a right to be there as the Angles and the Saxons did in kicking the celts out. Let's not even talk about if the anglo-Saxons had more legitimate claim than the norse-gaels.