this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
405 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden’s voice was strong and clear, and the crowd was far warmer to him as an outgoing president

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah - let's not glaze him up too much, or they might try to swap back.

Let him ride off into the sunset. The speech was okay, but I'd still rather have almost anyone else than him as the candidate (probably still not Hill-dawg)... and Kamala isn't at the bottom of that list of my prefs, so let's get her in office before we worry about whether or not the 80+ year old current president was awesome at his little send-off / goodbye speech.

Awesome to hear they let AOC speak though. Times really are shifting. You love to see it.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Awesome to hear they let AOC speak though.

OMG! They allowed her to speak! Wow.

Pathetic how happy the left gets over these crumbs being thrown to us.

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think you misinterpreted my “surprise” as some sort of Simping / ass kissing for the DNC.

Perhaps I should’ve phrased it more like :

“it was awesome hearing AOC. Surprised that the DNC did that. Times are changing.”