this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
851 points (100.0% liked)

196

16724 readers
2172 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
851
Core 2 Ruleo (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 4 months ago by Gork@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

5400 rpm was very common. 7200 were the performance drives.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

As I remember around 2007, 5400 RPM was frowned upon in builds.

The disks I have from that time is a WD RE2 (very noisy 7200 RPM) and a few WD Green's (I think they are slower than 5400 RPM just to mess with my arguments).

[–] trigonated@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

And if you wanted very high performance, you could go with a 10000rpm one.