this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
670 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

31182 readers
503 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can't use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it "presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions." The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it's completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 20 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Even if my Internet provider forced me to use their router I'd plug my own router in behind that one fuck that.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Some isp’s have been detecting the second router and giving people shit for it.

But I’m with you on that, I don’t trust the isp’s backdoored router-modem. Hard pass.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Some isp’s have been detecting the second router and giving people shit for it.

Giving people shit how? This is the first time I hear something like this. In my case, my ISP does not allow bridging a router, so I NAT mine instead, and it works just fine.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, they can still tell that you’re Nat behind another router.

But they don’t like it because it gives them less access to your network and more possibility for something to be wrong

[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I’ve never had an isp complain about me using my own router in the US, is this just common in other countries or have I just been lucky?

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

It’s a rarity afaik, I’ve only heard of one or two cases, but a concerning report to me personally.

Though I’m Canadian so it’ll be a few years before it filters here (assuming it catches on)

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

How would they do that? Maybe by looking at ports? You could just lie and say you only have one device.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The moment they see their ONT is registering only 1 device (the router) it's clear everything is being routed via that.

I have never not had a router natted behind my modem. They can see the amount of packets and data I use over the ISP, but that's about it. On top of that my LANs and VLANs are all VPNd through NordVPN before anything hits the WAN and all DNS traffic goes though my Adguard Home and Quad9 as well, so there's that.

[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do you trust NordVPN more than your ISP ? Is your ISP known to be especially bad ?

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

I trust any company that's not in my country more than any local company. Or I should say, I distrust local companies more.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

How do they know that it isn't just a single device network?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

They might be able to see if the data indicates the network has been though NAT (network address translation) twice, but that would look just like someone who has plugged their own wifi box into the modem

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Highly unlikely when you have hundreds of gigs passing through daily.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

But how would they prove that? I have high doubt. Also what benefit would it give them? It seems like a lot of work and uncertainty for little reward.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

I can't answer that. I guess you would need to be in their place to understand that backwards way of thinking.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably just MAC address lookups, but also possibly something weird like “ttl “ stats

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The MAC address would match the out bound interface of the router

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And if you “device type” that…. You’ll see a router likely.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes.

And they would ask “why is there a router on your network”

[–] suction@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At least try to understand what is being said to you, ok son?

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m very sorry that your life feels so out of control that you need to lash out so quickly with condescension.

Did you want to talk? Or perhaps explain where you think I misunderstand?

[–] suction@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Try to understand the comment you replied to, lazy ass.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't NAT. Just bump in the wire firewall plus local DNS server.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

There's always NAT. You get one IP address, your router/wifi shares the network using NAT

But ISPs aren't looking for NAT, since everyone with wifi is using it

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

My provider, small one from my town, or the attendant just decided to give me the password. After months, I found out how to extract the configurations and used my old router instead.