this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
784 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26933 readers
3670 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (5 children)

No kidding. I'm apparently the only person who has ever had an amicable divorce where we just realized we weren't compatible and never felt the need to bash each other. The post-divorce crowd can be pretty dire. They should mandate a certain number of therapy sessions before you can sign up for a dating app.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

From what I've learned, it has a lot to do with attachment styles.

My ex is avoidant, with some pretty narcissistic traits (love bombing, then refusal to even hug because it's too much).

I was/am anxious, or as the couples counselor told me "clingy."

In our one-on-ones, she summarized up a book we had been assigned (which my ex didn't read lol) that it was a statistic thing. 50% of people are secure style - they meet, and tend to stay together cause it just works. ~25% are anxious, and they do ok together and work fine with secure. ~25% are avoidant, and unfortunately, unless they work towards secure attachments, are pretty much always in and out of relationships. There's a small amount of "disorganized" that has both insecure styles, but they tend towards secure over time.

The result is that the older you get, the dating pool shrinks. There will always been avoidant people available though. Secure style people are great at recognizing avoidant and typically don't put up with their bullshit for long. Anxious attachment though end up with avoidants and it becomes a terrible thing, the anxious will do anything to stay, causing the avoidant to do things out of the relationship more.

If you could guess one common thing amongst avoidants that finally ends the relationship, what would it be? If you said cheating, you'd be completely right. It's really hard to end amicably after that.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Incels are on the rise, both genders. Where do they fit in your 100%? We're seeing the birth of hikkikomori culture.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I had to guess based on my understanding of attachment theory, it could be the anxious attachment, the avoidant, or the disorganized (which has traits of both, and is rare). In any case it's clearly the insecure attachment styles.

Based on the "incel" description itself though, I don't think you have enough information to guess either. An individual hokkikomori is clearly more avoidant than anything though, as they don't seek or hold relationships with others as valuable.

[–] Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

"Attached" by Amir Levine and Rachel Heller

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

The Boys and Girls Guide to Getting Down.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think the divorce part isthe point of the meme...

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yes but the post title is what I was responding to.

[–] Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Dude, I hear that loud and f-ing clear. I'm also someone who left a marriage without any real hate toward my ex. We were chill during the marriage and afterward. No cheating; no drama.

So when I re-entered the dating world a decade after I had previously been in it, I did not expect the amount of bitter dudes I've since come across. If your profile starts with you saying you won't tolerate a woman who does ______., I'm more concerned about how damaged you are from your previous relationship than I am about whether or not we would be a good match.

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I had one too. My ex and I are on great terms. It makes for some fun moments when we can joke about our divorce and make people uncomfortable.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

what i don't get is why people married people they knew were awful people, or awful for them.

anytime someone lies, cheats, or steals from me (or shows any disrespect, like verbal/physical abuse) i dump their ass.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My ex was a chill stoner with a good work ethic when we got together and we had many good years, then he lost job after job, stopped looking, got radicalized reading Stormfront, then eventually physically abusive. I could not convince him to seek help, since he got so paranoid.

People change, sometimes you change in opposing directions.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

that isn't change, that's failure to take responsibility for yourself. which makes for a shitty person, and a shitty partner.

hence why most radicalized people are shitty human beings. de-radicalizing requires people to realize they are responsible for their choices, and that the world is not some external force oppressing them.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Well it was a change, but I don't disagree. Instead of trying, he just looked for someone to blame. It's not like there aren't external forces but our own actions and thoughts are what we can control, and can make a big difference. He's doing better now, too late for us but he's working, paid child support, stopped drinking, still a racist fuck but realized he was his biggest problem and did work on himself.

[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. It does 🤣

There, now things are balanced again.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago