this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
454 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The law, which was passed in Minnesota last year, includes language requiring menstrual products to be available in bathrooms of all schools for grades 4 to 12 as a way to accommodate transgender students.

As part of their effort to portray Tim Walz, the new Democratic vice-presidential candidate, as a far-left liberal, the Trump campaign attacked the Minnesota governor on Tuesday for signing a bill last year that provides access to menstrual products for transgender students.

At issue is broadly inclusive language in the law, which states that products like pads, tampons and other products used for menstruation “must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12.” Republican state lawmakers in Minnesota had tried — and failed — to amend that bill so that it would apply only to “female restrooms,” though some Republicans went on to vote for the final version of bill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Laereht@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What do you think is at the bottom of these weirdo's barrel? Do they just try to claim that Harris and Walz are both secretly gay? Or trans? Or both?

[–] ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Gay, trans, commie, fascist, marxist, pedos, mean, dumb, elite, weak, powerful…

Take your pick, I guarantee every ‘slander’ you can imagine is on its way or already being used.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I wonder if he even still wants to win. Maybe he's smart enough to realize just how dangerous his plans are to him personally. Like the biggest outcry regarding the assassination attempt was that the shot missed, and project 2025 isn't even in full swing yet.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What do you think is at the bottom of these weirdo’s barrel?

NAMBLA

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's be clear, I hope we're talking about the North American Man/Boy Love Association and not the North American Marlon Brando Look-Alikes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

North American Marlon Brando Look-Alikes

Are we talking young Brando or old Brando?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 month ago

Let's go with old Brando. It might be hard to get young Brando look-alikes.

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

No no no this is "these weirdo's barrels at the (little boys) bottoms". So... Typical GOP closet stuff.