this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
877 points (98.0% liked)

World News

38500 readers
2649 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No im pretty sure all child rapists are pedophiles. I do not think the 2 ideas should be separated. You make it sound like you are cool with people being pedophiles as long as they're not a child rapist. Fucking weird.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Most child rapists are not pathologically attracted to children. It happens because of power imbalances or other factors.

You can think what you’d like but pedophelia has official DSM-5 Diagnostic criteria and there’s an entire academic body of literature behind this.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, i just dont care about anything you're talking about. All it comes off to me as you are trying to say being a pedophile is not that bad.

Claim whatever by whomever. Nothing now can change the fact that you are pro pedophile and thats just weird.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So correcting your terminology because you are using the word pedophile to have a different meaning than what it is dictionnary defined makes me “pro-pedophile” lol.

By your definition Marriam-Webster, Wikipedia, and pretty much every psychomedical academic journal is “pro-pedophile” then.

Fuck anyone who harms children. But being attracted to children is not a choice, science has proven that. And acting like these people are all evil (even if they’ve never acted on their urges) makes then less likely to seek help because of shame, and increases the rate of children who are hurt.

It’d do a lot of help if you atleast skimmed the wikipedia page on the topic.