politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Why?
Biden wanted to codify Trump's border policies. It was only a few months ago Biden wouldn't stop talking about it
And sure trump would have been worse, but the alternative matters. Kamala doesn't have that baggage.
The only thing that would be surprising is if any demographic suffered losses from replacing Joe.
I have heard, but not sure about accuracy, that Latinos who are already here in the US support shutting down the border as it's less competition and/or draws less attention from racisits persicuting all lationos regarless of immigration status. Kinda like a "got mine, fuck you" mentality which is very GOP.
Pulling the ladder up behind them is very conservative/boomerish indeed :/
Some do, especially when you're including the grandkids of wealthy Cubans who have never set foot outside the US.
But when the actions are the same, the tone matters less.
By matching trump on border policy, it lets a significant amount feel that they can support trump because "both parties are the same" on that topic.
It doesn't mean a gain for Democrats, just more people that don't feel obligated to stop trump.
It validates republican nonsense, and makes voters think maybe they were right about other stuff too. Just a massive fumble anyway you look at it.
I mean, giving the president that power would have almost guaranteed Republicans always used it, so when a Dem would get office, they'd all try to cross then. Giving Republicans ammunition for the next election and making it more likely even Dems shut the border down.
But Biden thought short term it would help him.
What makes you think Latino's don’t like Trump’s border policies? Clearly, there is not a single representative Latino, but there’s certainly a significant portion that likes closed borders.