"That's it! I'm gettin' me mallet!"
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
36 points (97.4% liked)
Illustrations of history
737 readers
46 users here now
This magazine is for sharing artwork of historical events, places, personages, etc. Scale models and the like also welcome!
Generally speaking, actual photos of a historical item should go to !historyartifacts@lemmy.world
Photos of ruins should go to !historyruins@lemmy.world
Photos of the past should go to !HistoryPorn@lemmy.world
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why are both sides in the water? It seems like staying on land and attacking people in the water as they try to climb out would work better. Props for the mallet backswing though.
English longbowmen waded into the river the English had to cross, and successfully drove back French crossbowmen from the banks.
So French cavalry rode into the river to kill the English longbowmen, but were stopped by English men-at-arms.
The French were driven back as more and more English arrived to help, and in the end broke ranks and fled.
So yeah, the French were in a much superior position occupying the banks, the English were absolutely forced to cross, and the French lost half their men in the battle, against light English casualties, due to their inability to deal with English longbowmen.
Which is kind of the running gag of the Hundred Years' War.
Huh. I'd have thought wading throw a hip-height river with a drawn bow would be just about the absolute worst for a longbow. But maybe it's not that bad if you get through fast enough?
I'm pretty sure damaging your bow while fighting your way across the river is better than keeping it sheathed while getting slaughtered by the French.
I'm also pretty sure they had spare bows in their wagon train.