this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
776 points (98.6% liked)

Greentext

3990 readers
1742 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works
776
Anon ponders the cosmic mysteries (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by MrJameGumb@lemmy.world to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The funny part is that if there were a god (there isn't), he would absolutely be an asshole.

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This assumes that if there was a god they are perfect and chose to make us with teeth that fail, bodies that get cancer, anger issues and mental health problems, etc

While that could be the case it could also be the case that if there was a god said god could just be a much higher level lifeform that could create galaxies and life and shit, but still was maybe not all that good at it. Like look at humanity. We can do crazy shit, we can make computers that do incomprehensible things to humans that existed as little as 50 years ago. But those computers still fucking suck and crash all the time, blue screen, lose data, etc.

Maybe there was a god that made humanity but he just wasn’t very good at it and as a result we now have cancer and war. and maybe they’re up there like “oh they’re deifying me, that’s super awkward bc it’s totally my fault their first child died of leukemia at 7 years old”. Or maybe they did all that and now they’re dead too because they’re not actually a god but just a higher lifeform and were deifying a loser that would’ve gotten a c on their biology homework

but there’s probably not one

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

An interesting argument. I don't think I've heard anyone seriously put this forward, only George Carlin (who was perhaps serious but not presenting it seriously).

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to be funny, but would you also characterize "nature" as being an asshole?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if it was a sentient being making the choices - yes.

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Gotcha. I guess I don't really see "God" as a sentient being exclusively, so applying characteristics to him has always been a challenge.