Fedigrow

601 readers

21 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

Blaze@lemm.ee

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works

LLM Chat Bots in our community (hackertalks.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/fedigrow@lemm.ee

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Saw a suspicious post resurrecting a 5 month old thread, and after a few back and forths:

https://linux.community/comment/3453531

I don’t understand why you are treating me like a robot. However, I can help with the Fibonacci sequence. Here is a Python 3 function to calculate it:

I'm torn, its nice to have activity in the fediverse, but I'm not convinced bots are the right way to go about it. Opinions on the future of engagement bots?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I don't think bots are a good way to boost engagement, but I don't think all bots should be banned either.

In The Other Place, I enjoyed labeled bots which performed a clear function or service, and replied only in specific circumstances, such as when they were summoned or a key phrase was mentioned.

Examples: stabbot, more JPEG auto, metric converter.

Can you think of any other examples of "useful bots"?

[–] Emotional_Series7814@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I could swear there was a community link fixer bot, which is pretty useful for people reading comments, trying to click a link to a community, and getting an error. Bot has the correct link as a reply.

Community-specific bots can be quite helpful. NameThatSong on Reddit had a bot that would run your post through song recognizer bots if your post had audio, to try to help the poster identify the song. I found it useful. I should probably figure out how to make a similar bot for !NameThatSong@lemmy.wtf someday.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

I could swear there was a community link fixer bot

Yup, there is: @CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Post scheduler: https://schedule.lemmings.world/

[–] Elevator7009@kbin.run 3 points 3 months ago

Some people are engaging with the weekly posts on !incremental_games@incremental.social (sadly having federation issues) that are in theory using a bot, but in practice mods have been manually making the post. But people engaged when it was actually the bot posting too.

!fedigrow@lemm.ee, !newcommunities@lemmy.world definitely have weekly posts that get interacted with. !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk used to, they are not regularly posted anymore, but when they are people interact. However, on all those communities, as far as I know (I think the post scheduler posts with your account so for all I know the bot could post it?), humans are making the bog-standard "what is going on in your community/active communities/what are you playing this week?" posts and I wonder if the fact a human is posting is what is driving the engagement there.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 3 months ago

the remind me in X days bot!

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It may not have been useful, but the gandolf and gronk bots provided many entertainment. My joyful emotion was used, at least

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Definitely! Entertainment absolutely qualifies as valid "utility", especially in the less serious meme communities.