Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
I really disliked breath of the wild. Especially how empty it feels and how bad it looks, different strokes I guess.
How bad it looks? That game was pure art, it was like living in a painting.
It looks dated, the grass without textures looks ugly and the faces look plain, and even with all those compromises the game can't run at stable 30 FPS, cmon
It's not a Zelda. I wish they hadn't destroyed the franchise by removing the main mechanic, but they wouldn't have been able to sell such a mid game without the draw of the franchise.
I would far rather have far fewer side quests with actual content instead of "collect 10 crickets" "collect 10 lizards." I'd rather be in the dungeons solving puzzles than wandering around for tens of minutes looking for temples. I'd rather spend more time shooting arrows than looking for arrows.
If those are your complaints, I'm genuinely confused about what you think "real" Zelda games are. Zelda has always been so much more than dungeon crawling, but it seems like that's all you care about. Plenty of other Zelda games had things that weren't just dungeons (like horse riding, fishing, mini games, talking to characters, shopping, mini puzzles, etc.) and involved a fair bit of wandering and searching. Once you actually play BOTW and TOTK you don't even really need to bother looking for arrows anymore, they're fucking everywhere and you can buy them all over the place.
Sounds like you just aren't a fan of Zelda, which is fine. But your claim that the recent games destroyed anything is just plain silly.
They're completely different. Since you haven't played them, the older games have a wide variety of interesting tools that unlocked a new area. Yes, exploration was linear, but things were fun and new instead of grinding out yet another segment of stamina bar to spend another several minutes climbing rock faces to get to more of the same glider/magnet/ice block puzzles.
If you think the new ones are the same type of thing at all you are willfully closing your eyes. It's cool that you like a mid game about collecting various numbers of nearly indistinguishable plants and critters but I wish Nintendo had done it with a new franchise. It's grating to have people claim they are Zelda fans when their favorite title is the soulless grinding entry.
So wrong there. I've played nearly every title. My favorite has been A Link to the Past. But, there will always be a place in my heart for the original. The N64 games were okay, but don't hold the same childhood nostalgia. There's a good chance I've been playing Zelda longer than you've been alive. You don't know what you're talking about.
If you don't want to hear people assert you haven't played this or that, perhaps you yourself should not do so.
If you cannot tell there is a significant difference in gameplay that started in BotW you weren't paying attention during nearly every title you played.
Pay attention this time. Nobody said they weren't different. I just said you seem to only like one aspect of the many varied aspects of the many varied Zelda games. Your reading comprehension skills are trash or you're just burning straw men to make yourself feel better. Stop being a troll.
Oh, what's this, I did literally write something about enjoying the side quests when they felt meaningful? Your eyes were closed during my comment like they are playing Zelda games. Unsurprising.
So what's that you were writing about strawmen? Because I did have fun with the parts off the main quest on the previous games. BotW scrapped all of it in favor of extremely mid fetch quests and grinding hearts or stamina.