this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1121 points (87.3% liked)

Political Memes

5203 readers
2703 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fchum@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All these arguments about left is this, right is that, no one can tell which is what...

It's almost as if just one axis can't describe the unending variety of beliefs people have. I'm sure one day we'll find a way to describe all those permutations of values everyone holds so dear in just one axis going left to right. Yes. Then the tribes will be clearly defined!

[–] Arn_Thor@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah, the good old “it’s too complicated” centrism. No. Some people are inclusive and some are exclusive. It’s not rocket science

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The more a person values the definition and maintenance of hierarchies, the less inclusive they can functionally be. Conservatives tend to venerate hierarchy. Christian Conservatives sanctify it.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

ISIS too. They do not get along with Conservative Christians, though.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

Both can be true.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I’m sure one day we’ll find a way to describe all those permutations of values everyone holds so dear

The problem with that is that there is essentially an infinite number of permutations for that, because there is basically an infinite number of political issues. And if any one issue is enough to distinguish another person's view point, then a method to describe all political beliefs would need to distinguish between those view points.

So the real question is what description/number of axises describes enough to be "good enough"?

This one seems to be imo "good enough".

https://10groups.github.io/