this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
584 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3430 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krimson@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Recently started using Bitwarden and it works really well. You can even ditch authenticator because it has OTP built in too.

I selfhost it though because I trust nobody with this type of sensitive data, encrypted or not.

[–] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 months ago (4 children)

By storing your passwords and otp in the same place it becomes 1 factor authentification

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not really as you're still protected from password breaches, which is most likely to happen anyways, especially if you self host.

If you're actively being targeted for your bitwarden password, you likely have bigger problems

[–] paholg@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not if you use 2 factor to access the password manager.

[–] faerbit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's still just one factor. You just secured it better.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

To set a scene, you awake in the middle of the night because your phone is making noise. Blearily you unlock it, glance at a prompt, and then approve a login and fall back asleep. The intruder now has access to your password manager!

They attempt to log into your bank and drain your life savings, but despite having your password it sends another prompt to your phone. This time, you wake up enough to realize something is wrong. This time, you deny the prompt.

The entire second paragraph cannot happen if your MFA is a single factor. Don't store MFA in your password manager!

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

If your MFA is stored in your password manager, you're not getting prompts to your phone about it. You're just prompted for a otp code that you have to go out of your way to copy/paste or type in from the manager.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I mean yeah it’s less secure than if they were separated. But my mom is never going to use a separate app for passwords and 2FA, so the two in one app is still better than nothing.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Blearily you unlock it, glance at a prompt, and then approve a login and fall back asleep.

The idea that people would approve that is wild to me.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mate, I've had users who were sharing an account that only some of them had MFA prompts for. They didn't bother checking who had initiated the prompt, they just approved it because it was easier. And that was while they were fully awake and thinking...

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

What's funny to me is that doing this while you know your target is asleep probably has a higher success rate just because they're more likely to press the wrong thing just because their eyes are groggy. I can read my phone without my glasses but when I wake up in the night that's not the case right away.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago

Bruh, if my phone is sending me notifications in the middle of the night, the first thing I'm doing is uninstalling whatever app is sending me notifications.

If people are that gullible to fall prey to an attack like this, managing OTP in two apps is probably more than they can handle anyway. Everybody has a different threat model, and it's okay if it's not covered by hardware passkeys and locally hashed and managed databases.

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically yes if my vault gets compromised I would be fucked. I have it firewalled tho and only accessible from home (or VPN to home). So should be pretty secure. I used google authenticator but found it a major pita (can't even search entries on Android, wtf?). If they make this more user friendly I'll gladly switch back to a seperate OTP store.

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I use aegis for the MFA portion.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Modern problems require modern solutions

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I was thinking about self hosting but I was worried it would be less secure. I don't really know a lot about setting that kind of thing up (I do have programming experience but don't have a lot of server hosting experience outside of doing it for games like Minecraft) and I feel like I'd mess it up and it would be a lot easier to get into than a hardened server. Especially cause the odds I get a virus or something is probably higher then the odds someone breaks into bitwarden's server. Idk if I'm wrong about this, would love to be corrected if I am, was just my initial thoughts when I switched over from a different password manager to bitwarden.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

If you don’t trust yourself 110%, don’t host it yourself. Too risky. I self-host everything, but I leave email and passwords to someone else because it’s just too important.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think the bigger thing to worry about is, what would happen if your server fails or is destroyed? Would you have a backup of all your passwords? And if yes, are those backups updated regularly and stored in a safe place that also won't get destroyed if the server gets destroyed (like, say, a house fire)?

Then, yes, you got the cybersecurity angle too

It's a lot to think about for something as important and fundamental to everything you do on the internet as passwords (and accounts)

[–] Avero 1 points 3 months ago

backups aren't that big of a deal with bitwarden as every client keeps a copy of the database that can be restored.

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It's pretty easy to setup using docker, you do need to know that ofcourse and how to setup dns and stuff.

I have it firewalled so my vault is not accessible from the internet, only from home or vpn to home.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

so no more authy? BITWARDEN HAS THAT BUILT IN???? thats AWESOME

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

So does keepass

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Yep, and Vaultwarden too!

Though the most secure practice is to store them separately.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The most secure practice for any high-value accounts (email etc) is to use WebAuthn with a hardware key like a Yubikey.

TOTP is still vulnerable to phishing (a fake login page can ask for both a password and a TOTP code) so business/corporate environments are moving away from them.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Sure, hardware keys are superior!

I'm only talking about best practtices when using TOTPs in particular.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It is a paid feature though if you don't selfhost

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The paid features aren't free if you self-host either. You still need a premium account to use premium features with a self-hosted Bitwarden, unless you modify the code and remove the licensing checks. Licenses are pretty cheap though.

The major features are free if you use Vaultwarden, which is an alternative server implementation.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] TurdMongler@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But it's cheap! $10 a YEAR when I last checked.

[–] Dreamless4561@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep, for only $10 per year. But just make sure to keep backups of your vault and/or make an emergency kit.

[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And it can also store passkeys to effortlessly sync between desktop/Android/iOS